| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vbo0gc$2j8nf$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: Phishing Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 16:31:21 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 54 Message-ID: <vbo0gc$2j8nf$1@dont-email.me> References: <vbcvp4$eoqp$1@dont-email.me> <lk3ko1F881iU1@mid.individual.net> <vbijfn$1igia$1@dont-email.me> <lk95rrF37u6U1@mid.individual.net> <vbnq2d$2iafa$1@dont-email.me> <lk98smF3m28U1@mid.individual.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 01:31:26 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="bd5209d22920f7a526b3d5e65c9ad27f"; logging-data="2728687"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/kmKeg5QsSltCoMJxGJH4I" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:a73xDrGx8PUm4qs835MbJULai6w= In-Reply-To: <lk98smF3m28U1@mid.individual.net> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 3530 On 9/9/2024 2:50 PM, Joerg wrote: > On 9/9/24 2:41 PM, Don Y wrote: >> On 9/9/2024 1:58 PM, Joerg wrote: >>>> Too late to prevent his ex-wife from sending $400 to "him"... >>>> >>>> Maybe she will have learned her lesson? >>> >>> Mine was a phone call. Heavy Indian accent, "This is the Windows company. We >>> would like to help you solve a problem we have detected with your >>> Windows"... me "Oh yeah, you are right, there are at least nine windows here >>> that really need cleaning. Do you use Windex for that?" >> >> We don't accept calls from "unknown" callers so don't have that problem. >> > > I don't either but I could not resist to pull that prank. Our phone simply doesn't ring so there is no "missed opportunity". (why would I want the phone to annoy me if I'm not going to answer it?) >> Regardless, one would *think* that folks could use some common sense; >> "How did this guy discover a problem with MY computer and know the >> telephone number that would get him in touch with ME?" >> >> We're really careful about giving out "personal" information, even to >> friends, out of fear they will record it in some device that can be >> compromised and used as a beachhead to access *us*. >> >> "My birthdate? Oh, you MISSED it -- it was a few years ago. But, >> that's OK; I wasn't expecting you to acknowledge it... Thanks >> for the sentiment, though!" >> >> [I use an assortment of random dates when queried by online services, >> 1/1/1980 being a favorite, for obvious reasons] > > I never give them anything. Many sites require a "valid date" to complete the "registration" process. Some will make the argument that they need "assurance" that you are of age to be able to enter into a legal relationship. Others, to ensure you aren't a "minor". (Amusing to think that they assume folks will be truthful in their answers and that simply *asking* the question constitutes "due diligence") We are also cautious about how to answer "security questions" (which can also leak information). "What was the name of your first pet?" 2334 B X Z (a common name, no?) And, never give out a phone number for 2FA. Of course, it means you have to keep careful track of your LIES... :>