Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Python <python@invalid.org>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 01:05:20 +0200
Organization: CCCP
Lines: 43
Message-ID: <vbqjbg$347cs$16@dont-email.me>
References: <23387e561af5e3d769b94ab9ddc5f74b@www.novabbs.com>
 <-hc8RY2DvPYBVYYkPGqCAQ_LJH8@jntp> <vbnhuq$2h766$1@dont-email.me>
 <1f3fcc821e128c2defe4b28133b8d924@www.novabbs.com>
 <G_KNnGcmCY6WbuLwh4obhtLESmI@jntp>
 <db349af5b33f8502614d1d8713b981c9@www.novabbs.com>
 <vbq9am$347cs$2@dont-email.me>
 <6033980852f334e192ab4a8b9a00dc38@www.novabbs.com>
 <L5jF4O5m6yAw56V96reSh4HtJk0@jntp> <vbqgef$347cs$13@dont-email.me>
 <iH9aMP6-3stjeiljdPwOKDOcfxk@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 01:05:20 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="bad0efb51fa3f5a837496519ffdb3988";
	logging-data="3284380"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Erpi0jkpXSzBZiBEdh9gl"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:tR2SsUepzbk+wYDq4extvHPk6wQ=
In-Reply-To: <iH9aMP6-3stjeiljdPwOKDOcfxk@jntp>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2833

Le 11/09/2024 à 00:42, Richard "Hachel" Lenflure a écrit :
> Le 11/09/2024 à 00:15, Python a écrit :
>> Le 11/09/2024 à 00:13, M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrume a écrit :
>>> Le 10/09/2024 à 23:04, clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) a 
>>> écrit :
>>>> Python: (snake!) Perhaps you can explain what in physics justifies
>>>> Einstein adding the "2" in the equation, doubling the deflection when
>>>> Einstein said Gerber's derivation was wrong?
>>>
>>> At the first solar eclipse, the measured deviation was twice what 
>>> Einstein predicted.
>>>
>>> A few months later, before the second solar eclipse, Einstein 
>>> corrected it.
>>
>> This is a plain lie. Ceci est un complet mensonge.
>>
>>> I personally don't like this. I call it patching up.
>>
>> Ouais, I don't like it either. This deserves a pie.
> 
> This is not a lie.
> 
> Einstein had predicted a deviation of 0.83 arc seconds in a 1914 
> article. However, the deflection was 1.7 arc seconds measured on 
> September 22, 1919.
> 
> In the meantime, two other eclipses had occurred, on which physicists 
> had been dispatched, but without "having been able to provide any 
> results because of the war(1) and because of the rain(2).
> 
> It still smells like a patch-up.
> 
> R.H.

I meant Eddington.

Your post is nothing but a bunch of lies. Provide sources is you
dare, sinister piece of shit!

Your pie will be loaded.