Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vbr172$3ddko$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: Better cheaper super capacitors
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 13:01:49 +1000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <vbr172$3ddko$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vbgo33$28h8v$1@solani.org>
 <stsodj1etjq4bnfbea9gqlbeefbf40p4pr@4ax.com> <vbq7qp$333ks$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 05:01:55 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="39d9a3ca0678c2852d2c035d586ab5f2";
	logging-data="3585688"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19ol93R2CZpQJoBHsiNFBHycbXkQM243YM="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:FnUDcJ6xb+36kImOOJSMQ4b6FyU=
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 240910-6, 11/9/2024), Outbound message
In-Reply-To: <vbq7qp$333ks$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2671

On 11/09/2024 5:48 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Sep 2024 08:45:22 -0700, john larkin wrote:
> 
>> On Sat, 07 Sep 2024 05:24:50 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Achieving a supercapacitor through the 'molecular coating' approach
>>> https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/09/240905121043.htm
>>
>> I doubt that supercaps will ever achieve the energy density of
>> batteries, and if they get close they will be equally explosive.
>>
>> People are inventing super "capacitors" that sound awfully
>> electrochemical to me.
>>
>> The threshold for a press release seems to be to make something that
>> will light an LED, which takes about a microwatt.
> 
> Absent some revolutionary new technology, I suspect you may be right. Mind
> you, we have people who are quite happy to only be able to drive for only
> 200 miles in an EV and wait several hours between re-charges.

Tesla's super-chargers are quicker than that, and 200 miles is a rather 
short range for modern EV.

And electricity is quite a bit cheaper per mile than gasoline.

> And suffer a
> *massive* deprecation on their 2nd biggest asset. *And* pay a fortune to
> have their old battery recycled. Fuggin' idiots.

The "massive depreciation" is a temporary blip in a developing market.

The fuggin' idiot here is Cursitor Doom, who would still be getting 
around by horse and buggy, if he could afford it.

-- 
Bill Sloman, Sydhney