| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vbr172$3ddko$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: Better cheaper super capacitors Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 13:01:49 +1000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 40 Message-ID: <vbr172$3ddko$1@dont-email.me> References: <vbgo33$28h8v$1@solani.org> <stsodj1etjq4bnfbea9gqlbeefbf40p4pr@4ax.com> <vbq7qp$333ks$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 05:01:55 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="39d9a3ca0678c2852d2c035d586ab5f2"; logging-data="3585688"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19ol93R2CZpQJoBHsiNFBHycbXkQM243YM=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:FnUDcJ6xb+36kImOOJSMQ4b6FyU= X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 240910-6, 11/9/2024), Outbound message In-Reply-To: <vbq7qp$333ks$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2671 On 11/09/2024 5:48 am, Cursitor Doom wrote: > On Sat, 07 Sep 2024 08:45:22 -0700, john larkin wrote: > >> On Sat, 07 Sep 2024 05:24:50 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>> Achieving a supercapacitor through the 'molecular coating' approach >>> https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/09/240905121043.htm >> >> I doubt that supercaps will ever achieve the energy density of >> batteries, and if they get close they will be equally explosive. >> >> People are inventing super "capacitors" that sound awfully >> electrochemical to me. >> >> The threshold for a press release seems to be to make something that >> will light an LED, which takes about a microwatt. > > Absent some revolutionary new technology, I suspect you may be right. Mind > you, we have people who are quite happy to only be able to drive for only > 200 miles in an EV and wait several hours between re-charges. Tesla's super-chargers are quicker than that, and 200 miles is a rather short range for modern EV. And electricity is quite a bit cheaper per mile than gasoline. > And suffer a > *massive* deprecation on their 2nd biggest asset. *And* pay a fortune to > have their old battery recycled. Fuggin' idiots. The "massive depreciation" is a temporary blip in a developing market. The fuggin' idiot here is Cursitor Doom, who would still be getting around by horse and buggy, if he could afford it. -- Bill Sloman, Sydhney