Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vbs055$3im2p$4@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 06:49:57 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 96 Message-ID: <vbs055$3im2p$4@dont-email.me> References: <vb4plc$2tqeg$1@dont-email.me> <vb6o5t$3a95s$1@dont-email.me> <vb71a3$3b4ub$4@dont-email.me> <vbbmuc$8nbb$1@dont-email.me> <vbcbe4$bdtb$3@dont-email.me> <vbeoge$q2ph$1@dont-email.me> <vbeprp$punj$7@dont-email.me> <c600a691fab10473128eed2a1fad2a429ad4733f@i2pn2.org> <vbh2sp$19ov0$1@dont-email.me> <vbhm3c$1c7u5$12@dont-email.me> <vbkdph$1v80k$1@dont-email.me> <vbne7e$2g6vo$6@dont-email.me> <vbpbps$2uib0$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 13:49:58 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1fbca11ebde057c24ab486512c233e96"; logging-data="3758169"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/subZjdqYI9heXCcOJ0yjm" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:hW8EdFHaCEivCx4hz18x5KeFRko= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <vbpbps$2uib0$1@dont-email.me> Bytes: 4994 On 9/10/2024 6:50 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: > Op 09.sep.2024 om 20:19 schreef olcott: >> On 9/8/2024 9:53 AM, Mikko wrote: >>> On 2024-09-07 13:57:00 +0000, olcott said: >>> >>>> On 9/7/2024 3:29 AM, Mikko wrote: >>>>> On 2024-09-07 05:12:19 +0000, joes said: >>>>> >>>>>> Am Fri, 06 Sep 2024 06:42:48 -0500 schrieb olcott: >>>>>>> On 9/6/2024 6:19 AM, Mikko wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2024-09-05 13:24:20 +0000, olcott said: >>>>>>>>> On 9/5/2024 2:34 AM, Mikko wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2024-09-03 13:00:50 +0000, olcott said: >>>>>>>>>>> On 9/3/2024 5:25 AM, Mikko wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-09-02 16:38:03 +0000, olcott said: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> A halt decider is a Turing machine that computes the >>>>>>>>>>>>> mapping from >>>>>>>>>>>>> its finite string input to the behavior that this finite >>>>>>>>>>>>> string >>>>>>>>>>>>> specifies. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> A halt decider needn't compute the full behaviour, only whether >>>>>>>>>>>> that behaviour is finite or infinite. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> New slave_stack at:1038c4 Begin Local Halt Decider Simulation >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Local Halt Decider: Infinite Recursion Detected Simulation >>>>>>>>>>> Stopped >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hence HHH(DDD)==0 is correct >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Nice to see that you don't disagree with what said. >>>>>>>>>> Unvortunately I can't agree with what you say. >>>>>>>>>> HHH terminates, >>>>>>>>>> os DDD obviously terminates, too. No valid >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> DDD emulated by HHH never reaches it final halt state. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If that iis true it means that HHH called by DDD does not return >>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>> therefore is not a ceicder. >>>>>>> The directly executed HHH is a decider. >>>>>> What does simulating it change about that? >>>>> >>>>> If the simulation is incorrect it may change anything. >>>>> >>>> PATHOLOGICAL RELATIONSHIPS CHANGE BEHAVIOR >>>> PATHOLOGICAL RELATIONSHIPS CHANGE BEHAVIOR >>>> PATHOLOGICAL RELATIONSHIPS CHANGE BEHAVIOR >>>> PATHOLOGICAL RELATIONSHIPS CHANGE BEHAVIOR >>>> PATHOLOGICAL RELATIONSHIPS CHANGE BEHAVIOR >>> >>> However, a correct simultation faithfully imitates the original >>> behaviour. >>> >> >> _DDD() >> [00002172] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping >> [00002173] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping >> [00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD >> [0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD) >> [0000217f] 83c404 add esp,+04 >> [00002182] 5d pop ebp >> [00002183] c3 ret >> Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183] >> >> A correct emulation obeys the x86 machine code even >> if this machine code catches the machine on fire. >> >> It is impossible for an emulation of DDD by HHH to >> reach machine address 00002183 AND YOU KNOW IT!!! >> > > It seems olcott also knows that HHH fails to reach the machine address > 00002183, because it stop the simulation too soon. No the issue is the you insist on remaining too stupid to understand unreachable code. void Infinite_Recursion() { Infinite_Recursion(); OutString("Can't possibly get here!"); } > A correct simulation > by the unmodified world class simulator shows that it does reach machine > address 00002183. Even HHH1 shows it. But HHH fails to machine address > 00002183. > Why does olcott ignore this truth? The evidence is overwhelming. -- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer