| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vbt2s6$3qjev$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech Subject: Re: connected lights Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 17:42:29 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 47 Message-ID: <vbt2s6$3qjev$2@dont-email.me> References: <NfYDO.437045$VK2e.110808@fx01.ams4> <vbq12l$3376h$1@dont-email.me> <5l0EO.497929$v0Jd.164943@fx06.ams4> <vbqnm3$37v20$1@dont-email.me> <emkEO.201680$kpic.80347@fx15.ams4> <rpr3ejt34mgh4ok31fm079ea1pppce4tvh@4ax.com> <vbsvph$3pk1g$5@dont-email.me> <vbt2df$3qi08$1@dont-email.me> Reply-To: frkrygow@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 23:42:31 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="47db5cd6d8adf37f9a6a43d2700cf876"; logging-data="4017631"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX185w98tgOpcTjMTVjaPzjk92PnPsUtytkU=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:PGBc5f7/cDEQoISTudzhmMnL59U= In-Reply-To: <vbt2df$3qi08$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US On 9/11/2024 5:34 PM, AMuzi wrote: > On 9/11/2024 3:49 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote: >> On 9/11/2024 3:37 PM, Wolfgang Strobl wrote: >>> Am Wed, 11 Sep 2024 17:23:22 GMT schrieb Roger Merriman >>> <roger@sarlet.com>: >>> >>> >>>> There is also the fact I like lights that can kick out more oomph >>>> that a >>>> Dynamo can do, and I’m not wild on such cut off beams, while my commute >>>> light has a low wide beam on low, ie fine around town and so on, >>>> with the >>>> High Beam to give a bit more punch in the woods and so on. >>> >>> In my experience, a modern, StVZO-conforming LED based headlight is more >>> than good enough for riding in city traffic. More power usually only >>> serves to blind other cyclists and still can't compete with car >>> headlights. Riding in the woods and in the dark, on the other hand, is >>> better done using a weaker, but wider beam. >>> >>> The only reasonable need I see for more powerful headlights is when >>> driving on unlit rural roads. Here you need a powerful low beam and >>> sometimes also a high beam. >> >> I agree woods riding is different than road riding. But I've done lots >> of unlit road riding with dyno lights and no problems. So have >> countless randonneurs. >> >> Night vision varies, I'm sure; but I believe the general desire for >> more and more and more lumens is caused by the same mechanism the >> triggers the desire for more and more rear cogs, less and less bike >> weight, bigger and bigger pickup trucks, etc. After a while, people >> are chasing advertising copy or quickly diminishing returns. >> > > You've repeated that for years, implying that unlike mere mortals you > are magically immune to the evil spell of marketers. OK, that could be > true. > > Or maybe other people actually ride offroad and actually need brighter > lights than you. Read again, Andrew. See where I said "I agree woods riding is different than road riding"? -- - Frank Krygowski