Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vbt7de$3r928$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lasse Langwadt <llc@fonz.dk> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: Op-amp mystery Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 00:59:58 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 48 Message-ID: <vbt7de$3r928$2@dont-email.me> References: <1qznz5d.1m219rjmrzni6N%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> <rhm0ejtf032lq1g2q7kkvl20081gsd1v8r@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 00:59:58 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="97a55fc7f401d78615cacb1fce312057"; logging-data="4039752"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/rSMSF7M0sRX67K9sSQvwuSHwnG2n908A=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:QKDw+iV1jpyRwxXkJhXp+C1H3rw= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <rhm0ejtf032lq1g2q7kkvl20081gsd1v8r@4ax.com> Bytes: 3179 On 9/10/24 16:47, john larkin wrote: > On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 10:31:37 +0100, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid > (Liz Tuddenham) wrote: > >> It's always the stupid things that cause the most trouble: >> >> I was working on a fairly straightforward experimental audio circuit >> using TL074 op-amps laid out on Veroboard, which is prone to inter-track >> shorts unless you are very careful with your soldering. The gain of a >> virtual-earth stage was too high, so I altered some resistor values to >> cut it down. > > Show us a pic of your breadboard! > >> >> As this was a stereo system, I experimented with one channel first and >> then switched off and replaced the equivalent resistors in the second >> channel (one of the other op-amps in the same chip). >> >> The input signal was a 6 Kc/s sinwave at about -10 dBu. After the >> modification, the volume control, which was in a feedback loop, didnt >> seem to make much difference. Then I realised that applying the signal >> to the left channel gave a distorted version of it in the right channel >> and vice-versa. Obviously I had shorted two tracks somewhere - but >> where? >> >> Things got even worse when I realised that the input signal was >> appearing on the virtual earth input of each op-amp, this definitely >> can't happen! I decided it was time to switch off the power supply and >> go and ponder the problem over a cup of tea. >> >> That was the point where I discovered I hadn't switched the power supply >> on in the first place. > > Sometimes people note that a CMOS circuit works properly with no power > supply, because some ESD diodes are rectifying a logic input. until all the inputs are low, then it only works until the bypass cap is discharged ;) seem to remember seeing a boost converter made from just a cmos gate and an inductor, using the output as input and the supply pins as output via the ESD diodes, but I can't find it again, but I found this https://www.edn.com/efficient-voltage-doubler-is-made-from-generic-cmos-inverters/