Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vbtsbq$38je$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: "Red" And The DoD Language Competition
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 23:57:33 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <vbtsbq$38je$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vbdndk$lt27$1@dont-email.me> <vbhvre$1eabl$1@dont-email.me> <vbimad$1j26j$6@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 06:57:31 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="63a211bc0083a84961071e8a6410a533";
	logging-data="107118"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX194HTsIkaTKn5PlYGBUuhWecWdbt/zrLEs="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:iWR/cISrvTzJJs+6cq0NXKzXVmI=
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.7246
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
Bytes: 2157

"Lawrence D'Oliveiro" <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote in message 
news:vbimad$1j26j$6@dont-email.me...
....
> Hey, terrific. Don't you wonder why people insist on returning "403
> Forbidden" for those using a command-line tool like wget?

No (as the operator of a web site). Most SEO tools and other 
useless/criminal scrapers like to fake their identification, and WGet is a 
favorite for that task. There are many owners that block that and many other 
abused user-agents. (The Ada-Auth.org blocks about 20 user-agents, but not 
WGet. See https://support.tigertech.net/error-blocked-user-agents for a 
better explanation than I can give as to why. I don't block all of these 
agents, but I do throttle some of them and block their access to parts of 
the site.)

Additionally, some sites want to provide access to their documents, but not 
really to allow people to copy them (in order to get advertising revenue 
from reading them). I know the owners of the Red specification are in this 
category, as I offered to host a copy in the AdaIC archives, and they turned 
that down.

             Randy.