Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vbv30b$aptk$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Command line globber/tokenizer library for C? Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 17:56:58 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 30 Message-ID: <vbv30b$aptk$1@dont-email.me> References: <lkbjchFebk9U1@mid.individual.net> <vbs1om$3jkch$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <vbsb94$1rsji$1@news.xmission.com> <vbsmlb$3o6n2$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <vbsu1d$3p7pp$1@dont-email.me> <vbtj88$1kpm$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <vbujak$733i$3@dont-email.me> <vbum9i$8h2o$1@dont-email.me> <vbuscj$9k96$4@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <vbv1ei$aisk$1@dont-email.me> <vbv2e2$amp8$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 17:56:59 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="648aad9f1eaa4c7f3f5ed6a7d6a50c92"; logging-data="354228"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+wfcK4Q0MbNbIPvem6ZjYH" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:bRdmPwOmlJ81cJuHhNx/J9JVvCY= X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 In-Reply-To: <vbv2e2$amp8$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> Bytes: 2792 On 12.09.2024 17:47, Bonita Montero wrote: > Am 12.09.2024 um 17:30 schrieb Janis Papanagnou: > >> Not only "roughly imagine"; I think the imperative languages have >> so many common basic concepts that you can have a quite good idea, >> especially if you know more than just two or three such languages. > > Then tell me which lanuage a) has this kind of mostly minimized > language-facilities and b) you can layout data structures 1:1 > like they fit into memory (platform-dependent). Don't know what you're trying to say here or what it is you aim at. If you think it's worth discussing please elaborate. > >> Yes, C++ can be written with a "C" mindset. But this is nothing >> I'd suggest. Better make yourself familiar with the new concepts >> (OO, genericity, or even simple things like references). - IMO. > > I'm using mostly all new features as you can see from my code. > But the mindset is still the same. I don't know you or your background or much of your programming. So please understand that I'm not inclined to make any comments about you or your code; this would be all speculative and not contribute anything to the discussion. If you had the impression that what I said was referring to you personally you were wrong. Janis