Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Python <python@invalid.org>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 23:45:04 +0200
Organization: CCCP
Lines: 52
Message-ID: <vbvnd0$eah9$3@dont-email.me>
References: <dad338831baa98f3eb1ca50452fd9401@www.novabbs.com>
 <97c2c8397e3438c708a9737638c6400b@www.novabbs.com>
 <Ioqv-kjMkurXg5wgjWCVAfjII5o@jntp>
 <ffbb8186fd90b7c548eb087cc855dd59@www.novabbs.com>
 <-tG8Hi03qne7eCcgi1yM30wkd7Y@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 23:45:05 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="779d1704219e859273d54b2c7ad97184";
	logging-data="469545"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19IS9zo5yr7JAQfQqSaMix8"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:nGg8XzXHKV4yzwml/loyLsK5UfI=
In-Reply-To: <-tG8Hi03qne7eCcgi1yM30wkd7Y@jntp>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3334

Le 12/09/2024 à 20:44, Richard Hachel a écrit :
> Le 12/09/2024 à 20:20, clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) a écrit :
>> R.H.: As long as the cause of the time dilation is relative motion per
>> se, then it will be necessarily self-contradictory.
> 
> I totally agree, it is obviously a huge blunder by physicists who, I 
> repeat, breathe, exhale, are making a huge blunder of incomprehension.
> Physicists confuse time dilation and chronotropy dilation.
> It is quite incredible that today, in 2024, we do not understand what I 
> am saying, because no one is making the effort to understand.
> 
> YOU, you confuse the two notions, and inevitably you find it absurd.
> 
> It is perfectly absurd, it is true, to think that the watch of two 
> speakers will beat continuously and reciprocally faster than the watch 
> opposite, and that at the meeting the two watches will mark the same 
> time, or worse, that each will be older than the other.
> 
> BUT ARE YOU ALL MORONS PHYSICISTS OR WHAT? ? ?
> 
> But you didn't understand anything, you didn't understand ANYTHING.
> 
> We breathe, we blow, we listen to the genius, we get the earwax out of 
> our ears.
> 
> It's not TIME that beats reciprocally less quickly on the other clock 
> (otherwise it's absurd on the way back), it's the internal CHRONOTROPY.
> 
> It's NOT the same thing.
> 
> To this chrootropy, we must add the crossed anisochrony (which is in 
> first degree relation with the distance).
> And there, no more problem.
> 
> Stella is 18 years old and Terrence 30 for Stella.
> And it's consistent, for Terrence, it's also Stella who is 18 years old, 
> and he who is 30.
> 
> I beg you.
> 
> I beg you to understand this phenomenon, and to stop, if possible, this 
> filthy dick contest which consists of denigrating everything I have said 
> for 40 years, for the simple pleasure of showing off your trilili which 
> you believe (Freud) is necessarily of an exceptional size compared to 
> that of others.
> 
> UNDERSTAND, and judge AFTERWARDS!

Ok! Done. You are a kook. So?