Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vc3l0m$1d7l3$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: No evidence Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2024 12:28:54 +0300 Organization: - Lines: 18 Message-ID: <vc3l0m$1d7l3$1@dont-email.me> References: <4144a4a378a851665e4e8cf08dd46467@www.novabbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2024 11:28:54 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="13667f7f784b12ddf646b0c4bb2cfab5"; logging-data="1482403"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18QvxokQ5cqXzSjOU8FIw3R" User-Agent: Unison/2.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:XW4bNx5EQOh9TyoYtdK4/qUxqX8= Bytes: 1411 On 2024-09-13 17:50:59 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen said: > Perhaps that goes for the relativistic formula for the effects of > gravity on atomic clocks. The relativistic formula for the effects of gravity on atomic clocks has been verified for weak fields. > What does electromagnetism have to do with the > decay rate of atomic clocks? The frequency of atomic clocks is not a decay rate. Atomic clocks are shielded against effects of electormagnetism. Similar shielding against gravity is not possible. -- Mikko