Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vc4ncn$1kpl3$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: another hint of quantum consciousness
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2024 21:18:44 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <vc4ncn$1kpl3$1@dont-email.me>
References: <0s9bej1bhklummnn5iduadn94uvvne5k26@4ax.com>
 <vc4hd6$1ja6d$1@dont-email.me> <31kbejpg6dos3fdm81oq42a4rgcenu4lk1@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2024 21:15:35 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="dcb14e8507e28657fc88c03b4400110e";
	logging-data="1730211"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/C/kwAkmRkd8Y81yM4bcKP"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.13.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:k0viotm5k92uYza8k0XnoYP8zT8=
In-Reply-To: <31kbejpg6dos3fdm81oq42a4rgcenu4lk1@4ax.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2335

On 9/14/24 20:08, john larkin wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 19:36:35 +0200, Jeroen Belleman
> <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:
> 
>> On 9/14/24 17:13, john larkin wrote:
>>>
>>> https://scitechdaily.com/groundbreaking-study-affirms-quantum-basis-for-consciousness-a-paradigm-shift-in-understanding-human-nature/
>>>
>>> Interesting way to define consciousness, the thing that goes away when
>>> an a general anesthetic is applied. That can be quantified.
>>>
>>
>> I paraphrase: "Since we don't know how it works, it must be quantum".
> 
> Or, more conventionally, "It can't be quantum because QM only works at
> liquid helium temperatures."
> 
>> That's it then: Quantum-something is merely religion. The god of the
>> gaps.
>>
>> There's a lot of quantum nonsense about. This is just one example.
>>
> 
> Well, explain how we can name one image out of maybe a million stored
> images, in a fraction of a second.
> 

Yes, that's the typical comeback of religious believers.

I don't know how it works. Let's find out. AI seems to be
getting there, and it requires no quantum theory. Just loads
of data and a lot of matrix math.

Jeroen Belleman