Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vc4ncn$1kpl3$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: another hint of quantum consciousness Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2024 21:18:44 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 34 Message-ID: <vc4ncn$1kpl3$1@dont-email.me> References: <0s9bej1bhklummnn5iduadn94uvvne5k26@4ax.com> <vc4hd6$1ja6d$1@dont-email.me> <31kbejpg6dos3fdm81oq42a4rgcenu4lk1@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2024 21:15:35 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="dcb14e8507e28657fc88c03b4400110e"; logging-data="1730211"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/C/kwAkmRkd8Y81yM4bcKP" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:k0viotm5k92uYza8k0XnoYP8zT8= In-Reply-To: <31kbejpg6dos3fdm81oq42a4rgcenu4lk1@4ax.com> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2335 On 9/14/24 20:08, john larkin wrote: > On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 19:36:35 +0200, Jeroen Belleman > <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote: > >> On 9/14/24 17:13, john larkin wrote: >>> >>> https://scitechdaily.com/groundbreaking-study-affirms-quantum-basis-for-consciousness-a-paradigm-shift-in-understanding-human-nature/ >>> >>> Interesting way to define consciousness, the thing that goes away when >>> an a general anesthetic is applied. That can be quantified. >>> >> >> I paraphrase: "Since we don't know how it works, it must be quantum". > > Or, more conventionally, "It can't be quantum because QM only works at > liquid helium temperatures." > >> That's it then: Quantum-something is merely religion. The god of the >> gaps. >> >> There's a lot of quantum nonsense about. This is just one example. >> > > Well, explain how we can name one image out of maybe a million stored > images, in a fraction of a second. > Yes, that's the typical comeback of religious believers. I don't know how it works. Let's find out. AI seems to be getting there, and it requires no quantum theory. Just loads of data and a lot of matrix math. Jeroen Belleman