| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vc4nlc$1knu4$4@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: 4D Visualisierung Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2024 12:20:12 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 56 Message-ID: <vc4nlc$1knu4$4@dont-email.me> References: <vantta$3j6c0$1@dont-email.me> <vbrjd1$3g9gq$1@dont-email.me> <vbrjjj$3g9gq$2@dont-email.me> <vbsu68$3pju5$1@dont-email.me> <vc2cht$1259j$1@dont-email.me> <vc3jr4$1231o$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2024 21:20:13 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3671068c93cccefc7b8d67f34ac1ec5f"; logging-data="1728452"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19YIkJuZusb0vwo4NGesa/M+JNZhgSpwIA=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:l9B9N/yeg2r5IijndxA6gTUOJDE= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <vc3jr4$1231o$1@dont-email.me> Bytes: 3272 On 9/14/2024 2:08 AM, guido wugi wrote: > Op 13-9-2024 om 23:58 schreef Chris M. Thomasson: >> On 9/11/2024 1:22 PM, guido wugi wrote: >>> Op 11-9-2024 om 10:15 schreef Chris M. Thomasson: >>>> On 9/11/2024 1:12 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>> On 8/28/2024 12:30 PM, guido wugi wrote: >>>>> [...] >>>>> >>>>> Check this out: >>>>> >>>>> https://youtu.be/IVR5I5mnrsg >>>>> >>>>> ;^) >>>> >>>> Also, iirc, this experiment of mine has a vector with a non-zero 4d >>>> component... >>>> >>>> https://youtu.be/KRkKZj9s3wk >>> >>> I don't understand it, but they're beautiful graphics alright! But 4D? >>> >>> Meanwhile I've put a Desmos4D graph of Clifford tori, Dupin cyclides >>> (also shown together!) and Hopf fibration. >>> bolnorm4D.CT-DC-HF | Desmos >>> <https://www.desmos.com/3d/rwj9vo31yc?lang=nl> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1y6qrsJff-g&list=PL5xDSSE1qfb6c7UHcURl6wXh0pH4ARB75&index=21 >>> >> >> Here is an example of a 4d vector ping ponging through -1...1 wrt its >> w component: >> >> https://www.facebook.com/share/v/PC17LfU94uUjW6DY >> >> So, the single attractor is at point (0, 0, 0, w) for the animation. >> There is a major effect on the field. Here is another simulation that >> shows the attractor at a fixed (0, 0, 0, 0) for the entire duration: >> >> https://www.facebook.com/share/v/DXKhRoGZmpB9fX5Y/ > > I don't see really the difference, sorry. There is a massive difference. Humm... The animation is rather fast. Try it in slow motion. > And: where is the w component *in* the graph? If it isn't *in* the > graph, it's just some external parameter upon a 3D-graph, isn't it? Well, the vector field algorithm is working on 4d vectors. However, I don't know where to plot a vector like (0, 0, 0, 1) unless I define some other axis in 3d. This does not seem quite "kosher" to me. Anyway, I can only see what the non-zero w components do to a field that has all zero w's. The 4d definitely casts an influence on the 3d components (x, y, z). Humm... I need to work on another animation that shows this off more, clearly...