Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vc4p6m$1kpl3$3@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: Electrostatic actuators to move robots legs... Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2024 21:49:39 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 115 Message-ID: <vc4p6m$1kpl3$3@dont-email.me> References: <vbtshm$4pvr$1@solani.org> <vbud7q$6hpt$1@dont-email.me> <vbug36$4imf$1@dont-email.me> <vbuneq$8hap$1@dont-email.me> <vc0g8c$3dsu$1@solani.org> <jSUEO.167440$QvZa.5887@fx08.ams4> <vc1889$6fkn$1@solani.org> <vc20pt$10e68$1@dont-email.me> <vc38gu$7cum$1@solani.org> <dckbejhnjbudp6a87862rashe8h8rgobef@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2024 21:46:30 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="dcb14e8507e28657fc88c03b4400110e"; logging-data="1730211"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/tR5f8JvlTEi85KvZhjHj+" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:fLxA6gvQT2p2EZmVsvAvxkGkXjM= In-Reply-To: <dckbejhnjbudp6a87862rashe8h8rgobef@4ax.com> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 6884 On 9/14/24 20:21, john larkin wrote: > On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 05:55:41 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> > wrote: > >> On a sunny day (Fri, 13 Sep 2024 20:40:55 +0200) it happened Jeroen Belleman >> <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote in <vc20pt$10e68$1@dont-email.me>: >> >>> On 9/13/24 13:38, Jan Panteltje wrote: >>>> On a sunny day (Fri, 13 Sep 2024 20:55:09 +1000) it happened Chris Jones >>>> <lugnut808@spam.yahoo.com> wrote in <jSUEO.167440$QvZa.5887@fx08.ams4>: >>>> >>>>> On 13/09/2024 2:49 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote: >>>>>> On a sunny day (Thu, 12 Sep 2024 14:43:02 +0200) it happened Jeroen Belleman >>>>>> <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote in <vbuneq$8hap$1@dont-email.me>: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 9/12/24 12:34, Jeff Layman wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/09/2024 10:45, Cursitor Doom wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Sep 2024 05:00:38 GMT, Jan Panteltje wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Artificial muscles propel a robotic leg to walk and jump: >>>>>>>>>> Â https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/09/240909113111.htm >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> quote: >>>>>>>>>> Â " >>>>>>>>>> Â The actuators are oil-filled plastic bags, similar to those used to >>>>>>>>>> Â make ice cubes. >>>>>>>>>> Â About half of each bag is coated on either side with a black electrode >>>>>>>>>> Â made of a conductive material. >>>>>>>>>> Â Buchner explains that "as soon as we apply a voltage to the >>>>>>>>>> electrodes, >>>>>>>>>> Â they are attracted to each other due to static electricity. >>>>>>>>>> Â ... >>>>>>>>>> Â " >>>>>>>>>> And press the fluid out.... >>>>>>>>>> So electrostatic actuators! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> How does that not violate thermodynamics? You seem to be getting useful >>>>>>>>> power from zero energy. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> How do little pieces of paper defy gravity when you put a charged comb >>>>>>>> near them? Isn't the energy supplied by rubbing the comb against some >>>>>>>> material to give it the charge to attract the paper? Where does the >>>>>>>> voltage come from which is applied to the bag electrodes? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Didn't we discuss something like this not too long ago, or was it in >>>>>>>> another NG? >>>>>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrostatic_motor> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That was right here in s.e.d in July. And no, thermodynamics, or >>>>>>> rather conservation of energy is not violated. It never is. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't think that they can get useful amounts of work out of these >>>>>>> things. The Science Daily article is useless, as always, and I did >>>>>>> not bother to read the paper. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jeroen Belleman >>>>>> >>>>>> At least they made something that works, >>>>>> unlike the trillions spend at CERN that never do anything for anybody. >>>>>> I would cancel all funding to CERN if they did not come up with something revolutionary and practical useful in a year. >>>>>> He who does not want to see is practically blind. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Kicad and web browsers are quite useful, even if the physics is of no >>>>> interest to you. >>>> >>>> html was invented long ago by somebody from CERN >>>> https://nl.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Berners-Lee >>>> quote in Dutch: >>>> " Timothy John (Tim) Berners-Lee (Londen, 8 juni 1955) is samen met zijn toenmalig manager, de Belg Robert Cailliau, >>>> de bedenker en grondlegger van de technologie en het protocol, die het world wide web of wereldwijde web, afgekort tot www, >>>> mogelijk maakten. Hieraan werkte hij toen hij consultant-software-engineer in dienst bij het CERN in Zwitserland was, >>>> van juni tot en met december 1990" >>>> >>>> Timothy John (Tim) Berners-Lee only worked at CERN from june to december 1990 >>>> So basicaly nothing to do with CERN or elementary particles etc. >>>> There is old html server code I had somewhere from a CERN website that I once used. >>>> Modern browsers are hopelessly bloated with other stuff, mostly for enabling more advertizing :-) >>>> >>>> Without CERN he likely would have invented it anyways, maybe earlier :-) >>>> >>> >>> I think Berners-Lee spent more time at CERN than that. He was a software >>> engineer involved in data acquisition software for physics experiments. >>> We were in the same department. I've been in meetings with him present. >>> This was in the 1980s. We were young. The subject at the time was >>> FastBus software libraries. FastBus was used in the LEP experiments, >>> but it was expensive and cumbersome and never lived up to expectations. >>> It died with the end of LEP. >> Here is the English wikipedia site, more info, says the same thing about hiistime at CERN though >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Berners-Lee >> You can correct stuff on wikipedia if you want. >> > > Fastbus was an even stranger version of CAMAC. > > We used to sell CAMAC modules and crates but passed on Fastbus, went > to VME instead. > > There are still a couple of people making CAMAC, I think. VME is > still a sizable market. > Good decision. Fastbus was a monster. It wasn't all that fast either, depite being all ECL. Near the end of the 1980s, physicists had understood that too, and they embarked on the design of another monster: The Scalable Coherent Interconnect, or SCI. Thankfully, that never went anywhere, as far as I can tell. I left that department around that time and concentrated on accelerator instrumentation instead. Jeroen Belleman