Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The HOAX of GR effects in GPS and other artificial satellites,
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2024 14:31:16 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 148
Message-ID: <vc6jvf$25nup$1@dont-email.me>
References: <55dd6d7aedf3d92af90dfb33b2854ef5@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2024 14:29:35 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7043572a1b74978e8060f32ad313a6f5";
	logging-data="2285529"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18uQj2blhdPt/WfnSVWMW6k"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:y72TnhXmB7TxYHWuVsJcQhKIz4k=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <55dd6d7aedf3d92af90dfb33b2854ef5@www.novabbs.com>
Bytes: 6236

Den 15.09.2024 03:26, skrev rhertz:
> Since 1911, Einstein and relativistic heirs have been rotting physics
> with the fairy tale about gravity affecting time shown in any kind of
> clocks (mechanical, quartz based and atomic clocks).
> 
> In particular, and derived from 110 years old Schwarzchild's solution to
> a VERY BASIC PROBLEM, it has been widely spread between relativistic
> circles that ANY CLOCK raised to ANY HEIGHT above ground presents a time
> or frequency difference (gravitational blue shift, from Schwarzschild
> metric) of:
> 
> 
> Δf/f = (GMe/c²) (1/R - 1/a) , where R is the Earth's radius and "a" is
> the height of the clock above ground.
> 
> The above equation came from 1911 Einstein's paper, 

You know better, Richard!
Why this obsession with Einstein's 1911 paper?

> ratified later in
> 1915 through GR, that THE GRAVITATIONAL POTENTIAL Φ = -GMe/R affects EM
> radiation by a factor Φ/c², increasing its energy (as the clock is
> raised) to a value of  Eo (1 + Φ/c²), where Eo is the energy at ground
> level.

No, THE GRAVITATIONAL POTENTIAL doesn't affect the radiation.
If the emitter and detector are at different heights, both
clocks run at their normal rate.
But the DIFFERENCE in the gravitational potential affects
the receiver's measurements of the radiation.
The gravitational Doppler shift is caused by a relationship
between the clocks.

Like 'normal' Doppler shift is caused by the relative speed
between emitter and source. The clocks in the receiver and
source are both running at their normal rate.
But the DIFFERENCE in the speeds affects the receiver's
measurements
of the radiation.
The Doppler shift is caused by a relationship between the clocks.

> 
> 
> In simpler terms, the gravitational potential gained by a raised object
> is POTENTIAL ENERGY, which affects
> measured time (allegedly) if the object is a clock.

No.

> 
> 
> Now, the AWFUL TRUTH that every single blind and deaf relativist CHOOSE
> TO IGNORE:
> 
> 1. EVERY SINGLE SATELLITE IN STABLE ORBIT (MANNED OR NOT) HAS
> MICROGRAVITY WITHIN IT, WHICH AFFECTS EVERYTHING INSIDE THE SATELLITE,
> EITHER LIVE FORMS OR ARTIFACTS.
> 
> 2, FOR ANY PRACTICAL CASE, ARTIFACTS LIKE CLOCKS OPERATE AS IF g = ZERO,
> DUE TO CENTRIPENTAL FORCES THAT ARE EQUAL TO GRAVITATIONAL FORCES (that
> would make them to fall to Earth).

So physicists CHOOSE TO IGNORE the AWFUL TRUTH that satellites are
in free fall!

Good catch, Richard. :-D

> 
> THIS IS PHYSICALLY EQUIVALENT TO THE CASE OF A MIRROR OF EARTH PLACED AT
> EQUAL DISTANCE FROM THE CENTER OF EARTH, BUT LOCATED ABOVE OF THE
> SATELLITE (R vs. -R, referenced to the satellite).

:-D

And the orbit of the satellite would be unaffected by the second Earth?

> 
> THEREFORE, THE GRAVITATIONAL POTENTIAL ACTING UPON ANY ONBOARD CLOCK IS
> ZERO (MICROGRAVITY).

Of course the satellite is unaffected by the gravitational
potential. That's why the clock in the satellite is running at
it's normal rate, a second per second as defined by SI.

According to SR and GR all clocks are always running at their
normal rate.

Didn't you know that, Richard?

> 
> Due to the above concepts, any onboard clock CAN'T BE AFFECTED BY
> GRAVITY, 

This is correct.

> SO SCHWARZCHILD'S SOLUTION IS FALSE WITH RESPECT TO GR EFFECTS.

But this is wrong.
Or rather - it isn't even wrong because the statement is meaningless.

> 
> Only IF such clock would be at the top of a very long pole above the
> surface, and not moving at all, using the alleged effects of the
> gravitational (potential) energy would be correct in terms of GR.

So a clock at the top of a 35,796.724 km long pole, would,
like the geostationary satellite it is attached to, be stationary?

> 
> The only remaining effect for an orbiting satellite, would be the STUPID
> TIME DILATION due to its motion.
> 
> So, for all of the above, the relativists supporting the crap of
> relativity effects on clocks orbiting Earth have to redefine the stupid
> theory. Better yet, abandon physics and start a career as gardeners.

Quite.
The stupid physicists believe that the predictions of GR for
the behaviour of clocks in the vicinity of the Earth are
confirmed by these experiments:

https://paulba.no/paper/Hafele_Keating.pdf
https://paulba.no/paper/Alley.pdf
https://paulba.no/paper/Initial_results_of_GPS_satellite_1977.pdf
https://paulba.no/paper/Vessot.pdf

But Richard Hertz knows that all physicists born after 1900 are
members of a MAFFIA, and profit from it. This is because he knows
the different results are COOKED with the help of statistical 
manipulations, fraud, cooking and peer complicity.

And Richard Hertz knows the GPS doesn't work because it is
designed according to the false Schwarzschild metric.

> 
> 
> As if the above IS NOT ENOUGH, exhaustive experiments done by France
> since 2017 SHOWS (with error <10E-15) that THE EQUIVALENCE PRINCIPLE
> BREAKS AT QUANTUM LEVEL.

WOW! This is so world shattering that it deserves a separate post!

-- 
Paul

https://paulba.no/