Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vc6jvs$25nup$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The HOAX of GR effects in GPS and other artificial satellites,
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2024 14:31:29 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 84
Message-ID: <vc6jvs$25nup$2@dont-email.me>
References: <55dd6d7aedf3d92af90dfb33b2854ef5@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2024 14:29:49 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7043572a1b74978e8060f32ad313a6f5";
	logging-data="2285529"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/Yq0FMUQrYrNcszHi/tOgN"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:N7uasqSom+jlcWmdVuR7hYd7F14=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <55dd6d7aedf3d92af90dfb33b2854ef5@www.novabbs.com>
Bytes: 4230

Den 15.09.2024 03:26, skrev rhertz:
> 
> As if the above IS NOT ENOUGH, exhaustive experiments done by France
> since 2017 SHOWS (with error <10E-15) that THE EQUIVALENCE PRINCIPLE
> BREAKS AT QUANTUM LEVEL.
> 
> As they wrote here:
> 
> https://www.oca.eu/en/news-lagrange/1363-first-results-from-microscope-satellite-confirm-albert-einstein-s-theory-of-relativity-with-unprecedented-precision

Didn't you notice the headline which is even in the link above?

"First results from Microscope satellite confirm Albert Einstein’s
  theory of relativity with unprecedented precision.

Quote:
"Measurements of the equivalence principle had not been improved
  upon for 10 years, but now the first results from CNES’s Microscope
  satellite, equipped with accelerometers supplied by the French
  aerospace research agency ONERA, are 10 times better. They show,
  with an unprecedented precision of 2.E-14, that bodies in a vacuum
  fall with the same acceleration. The equivalence principle has so
  far proved unshakeable and this result simply reconfirms the theory
  of general relativity postulated by Albert Einstein over a century
  ago."

Where did you read that
"THE EQUIVALENCE PRINCIPLE BREAKS AT QUANTUM LEVEL"?

Another quote:
"A universal theory unifying gravitation and quantum physics is
  therefore the holy grail of physicists in the 21st century.
  Certain candidate theories predict that the principle of
  the equivalence between gravitation and acceleration, at
  the heart of the theory of general relativity, could be violated
  at very weak levels. Microscope is pushing this principle to its
  limits and yielding new indications to constrain the theory of
  general relativity."

Note this!
Certain candidate theories predict that the equivalence principle
could be violated at very weak levels.

These candidate theories are alternative theories to GR.
> 
> QUOTE:
> 
> «The satellite’s performance is far exceeding expectations. Data from
> more than 1,900 additional orbits are already available and more are to
> come, which should enable us to further improve the mission’s
> performance and approach its target of acquiring measurements with a
> precision of 10-15. This first result is going to shake the world of
> physics and will certainly lead to a revision of alternative theories to
> general relativity,» said the mission’s principal investigator Pierre
> Touboul.

It is the alternative theories which predict that
the equivalence principle could be violated at very weak levels
that have to be revised, not GR.

Because this experiment has shown that the equivalence principle
is NOT violated at very weak levels.


How is it possible to read a text, and believe that it says
the exact opposite of what it says?

You have yet again made a giant fool of yourself, Richard.

Well done! :-D

> 
> Enjoy slowly, relativists. Please don't choke on your stupidity, as you
> are allowed to fail for being just humans.

Did you shoot yourself in the foot, Richard? :-D

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vfONckOPyaI

-- 
Paul

https://paulba.no/