| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vc6t0k$27fdb$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: another hint of quantum consciousness Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 01:03:45 +1000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 115 Message-ID: <vc6t0k$27fdb$1@dont-email.me> References: <0s9bej1bhklummnn5iduadn94uvvne5k26@4ax.com> <vc4hd6$1ja6d$1@dont-email.me> <31kbejpg6dos3fdm81oq42a4rgcenu4lk1@4ax.com> <vc4ncn$1kpl3$1@dont-email.me> <hfhcej9vlqdlpef8cadk6g74lguj5nldpj@4ax.com> <vcjcejhh5qpktvu0nnf8ieb2sg5ekjdh5o@4ax.com> <vc5su1$200qt$6@dont-email.me> <vc6ean$6m7e$1@solani.org> <vc6rnd$273n7$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2024 17:03:50 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5733cd32c3ded23ded32569090480718"; logging-data="2342315"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18d84WGXLLntado9KHEaBr6ALDxDJcv5wA=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:7OV9T75+zGtrfYL4nnni+axRvXY= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <vc6rnd$273n7$1@dont-email.me> X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 240915-4, 15/9/2024), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Bytes: 5663 On 16/09/2024 12:44 am, Jeroen Belleman wrote: > On 9/15/24 12:53, Jan Panteltje wrote: >> On a sunny day (Sun, 15 Sep 2024 15:56:16 +1000) it happened Bill Sloman >> <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vc5su1$200qt$6@dont-email.me>: >> >>> On 15/09/2024 1:03 pm, john larkin wrote: >>>> On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 19:39:20 -0700, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 21:18:44 +0200, Jeroen Belleman >>>>> <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 9/14/24 20:08, john larkin wrote: >>>>>>> On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 19:36:35 +0200, Jeroen Belleman >>>>>>> <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 9/14/24 17:13, john larkin wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://scitechdaily.com/groundbreaking-study-affirms-quantum-basis-for-consciousness-a-paradigm-shift-in-understanding-human-nature/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Interesting way to define consciousness, the thing that goes >>>>>>>>> away when >>>>>>>>> an a general anesthetic is applied. That can be quantified. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I paraphrase: "Since we don't know how it works, it must be >>>>>>>> quantum". >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Or, more conventionally, "It can't be quantum because QM only >>>>>>> works at >>>>>>> liquid helium temperatures." >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That's it then: Quantum-something is merely religion. The god of >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> gaps. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There's a lot of quantum nonsense about. This is just one example. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Well, explain how we can name one image out of maybe a million >>>>>>> stored >>>>>>> images, in a fraction of a second. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes, that's the typical comeback of religious believers. >>>>> >>>>> I don't recall invoking religion here, or calling myself a believer. I >>>>> was asking about image storage and high-speed matching. It's even more >>>>> amazing when you consider all the optical distortions and viewing >>>>> angles and changes in illumination and motion effects in real life; we >>>>> don't match nice flat photos. >>>>> >>>>> How are our collections of images stored? >>>>> >>>>> When some people encounter an unwelcome idea, they call the people >>>>> that they disagree with bible bangers, and assume they have won the >>>>> argument. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't know how it works. Let's find out. AI seems to be >>>>>> getting there, and it requires no quantum theory. Just loads >>>>>> of data and a lot of matrix math. >>>>> >>>>> You are determined to exclude the possibility that are brains use QM. >>>>> >>>>> Given that most all physics and chemistry is fundamentally quantum >>>>> mechanical, why would evolution refuse to allow cells to use quantum >>>>> effects? >>>>> >>>>> Most people don't really believe in evolution. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Jeroen Belleman >>>> >>>> It would be pretty good packing, storing one bit of data per atom. >>>> >>>> https://interestingengineering.com/science/wobble-nucleus-of-atom-quantum-data >>>> >>>> or maybe more than one. >>>> >>>> Nice possibilities for quantum correlation, pattern matching, too. >>> >>> If evolution is that clever, why doesn't it exploit error-detecton and >>> -correction coding? >>> Bill Sloman, Sydney >> >> It does all the time in RNA DNA >> I was reading this stuff this morning: >> Explaning DNA organisation in chromosomes: >> https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/09/240912135801.htm >> http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sstr.202400203 >> there is still a lot to learn >> >> design something, write some code, show us. >> plenty of broken records around, not interesting. > > An organism with extensive DNA repair ability is Deinococcus > Radiodurans, so evolution is apparently clever enough. The fact that it survives high radiation levels isn't evidence that it uses an error-detection and -correction coding scheme. https://www.nature.com/articles/nrmicro1264 doesn't make any such claim. Covid-19 has a "proof-reading stage" in it's RNA replication mechanism, which makes it less likely to make replication errors, but it isn't any kind of error-detection and correction coding scheme. -- Bill Sloman, Sydney