Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vc71j6$ida$1@panix2.panix.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.panix2.panix.com!panix2.panix.com!not-for-mail From: kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.fandom Subject: Re: AKICIF: The Shape of Asterix Date: 15 Sep 2024 16:21:58 -0000 Organization: Former users of Netcom shell (1989-2000) Lines: 20 Message-ID: <vc71j6$ida$1@panix2.panix.com> References: <8dj9ejhbmbrlh3a0np07kbi2ivdqm3ift3@4ax.com> <memo.20240914120439.22052A@pauldormer.cix.co.uk> <vc4cr4$82r$1@panix2.panix.com> <vc4mqg$pfu$1@reader1.panix.com> Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="panix2.panix.com:166.84.1.2"; logging-data="3953"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com" Bytes: 1515 Keith F. Lynch <kfl@KeithLynch.net> wrote: >Scott Dorsey <kludge@panix.com> wrote: >> And then we have book sizes which were all functions of the original >> folio size but with the coming of rotary presses are all different >> now... > >I keep waiting for new SF to come out in mass market paperback. And >it never does. I don't know, I have seen a lot of PoD stuff coming out in MMPG size. As I mentioned in r.a.sf.w the other day, I just read Ilona Andrews' recent book _Diamond Fire_ in that format. I thought both the story and the printing were deficient but it was an actual newly printed MMPG. To be honest I do prefer the now-more-popular softcover sizes just because my vision is poor. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."