Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vc7ckl$2b3vc$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: uk.telecom.mobile,comp.mobile.ipad,misc.phone.mobile.iphone
Subject: Re: Does Apple normally add the UK when the EU forces Apple
 to care about its customers?
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2024 19:30:29 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 57
Message-ID: <vc7ckl$2b3vc$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vc1pl8$6df$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <vc1s1i$vfjd$1@dont-email.me>
 <vc1sc4$vifb$1@dont-email.me>
 <lklmn5Fu57cU1@mid.individual.net>
 <vc496k$1hflv$1@dont-email.me>
 <xWhFO.50886$WtV9.5280@fx10.iad>
 <lnlFO.389763$grz1.214193@usenetxs.com>
 <vc4udn$8cdv$1@matrix.hispagatos.org>
 <vc60hd$21ne2$1@dont-email.me>
 <vc6rk8$27cs1$1@dont-email.me>
 <vc6tg1$27v6c$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2024 21:30:30 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3ef58deafb6990639f922cdbbbea51db";
	logging-data="2461676"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+iaEodjau2OXAwCnVe6zPM3s67FI+EHj0="
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:pI4uLgXpcIsQs3RDsc0a99Yx2sU=
	sha1:M5XBIfzva4yC8tVUwy3sqjc32iU=
Bytes: 4238

Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:
> Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Bill Powell <bill@anarchists.org> wrote:
>>>> Apple should be able to make any connector it wants to make.
>>>> Even one which is designed specifically to prevent interaction.
>>>> 
>>>> If people would just stick only to Apple products, they'd be fine
>>>> as there's no need for interoperability if you buy only Apple product.
>>>> 
>>>> As Tim Cook openly said, "Buy your mom an iPhone" if you want your device 
>>>> to work with another company's products. It's all Apple around here.
>>>> 
>>>> So it shouldn't matter if nobody else uses Apple's connector.
>>>> It's a free and openly competitive world market, isn't it?
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thing is, Apple didn’t even have inter operability between its own
>>> products. 
>> 
>> Agree. And I've said this before on here. 
>> 
>> Apple didn't transition to USB-C from USB-A well or consistently. When Macs
>> lost USB-A ports phones should have gone the same way shortly after. 
>> 
>> What happened instead is that Apple bundled phones with USB-A - lightning
>> charges for years without an ability to charge your phone with your Mac. In
>> all that time they sold billions of phones with USB-A chargers. 
>> 
>> Then, when they transitioned to USB-C, only at one end of the cable, they
>> also removed the charger (apart from ones model). So forced everyone to buy
>> chargers. 
>> 
>>> MacBooks have had USB-C for years (you can’t push enough power
>>> through a Lightning connector) So you couldn’t use your Mac charger to
>>> charge your Lightning connector iPhone or iPad or ear phones. Now you can.
>>> I’d understand reluctance to move to usb-c if there were any significant
>>> technical downsides, but I can’t see any. It supports a wider range of
>>> charge voltages than Lightning, has a more robust connector, (though some
>>> disagree about this) and supports a much wider range of protocols including
>>> high speed video. Lightning was a much better technical and mechanical
>>> solution than micro USB, but it is now technically and commercially
>>> obsolete. 
>> 
>> Agree. Lightning should have died 3-4 years ago. 
>> 
>> 
> I wonder if Covid and the semi conductor shortage had anything to do with
> Lightning hanging on longer than it should? All manufacturers in all
> electronics sectors had supply problems, mainly with the dull low value
> devices - such as usb and power supervisory chips. As Apple had a monopoly
> with Lightning in phones perhaps they had fewer problems getting hold of
> these parts. Just speculating. 

I guess that's possible. Not sure why lightning parts would be more
sourceable than the more ubiquitous USB, though?