Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vc99cm$2ratm$3@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: WinTel tower PC With a mouse & a large monitor.
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 12:47:18 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <vc99cm$2ratm$3@dont-email.me>
References: <vbrgo0$3fqkc$1@dont-email.me>
 <lke7ipFqgraU1@mid.individual.net>
 <Jeff-Relf.Me@Sep.11--4.00pm.Seattle.2024>
 <lkeoriFsrusU1@mid.individual.net>
 <Jeff-Relf.Me@Sep.11--5.50pm.Seattle.2024>
 <lkf47nFug7qU1@mid.individual.net>
 <Jeff-Relf.Me@Sep.11--9.04pm.Seattle.2024>
 <20q6ejltvtvkotm8mfst583es48k1nun6c@4ax.com>
 <lkh9jdFa6gnU1@mid.individual.net>
 <alu7ejp17crsdsvq6bpoe8a85ifbc24v59@4ax.com>
 <lkjgkiFke5jU1@mid.individual.net> <vc7qe6$2eamh$1@dont-email.me>
 <lkpgfnFj8rkU1@mid.individual.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 14:47:19 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="85f40cb19e3c7fa3ee01cb61147561d6";
	logging-data="2993078"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19KWtAPTIS+X5pREkfJCiBu"
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:+4TEnVvuxMLwhhia+W12w6/1bZo=
Bytes: 2833

On 2024-09-16, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 23:25:59 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>
>> On 13 Sep 2024 19:03:47 GMT, rbowman wrote:
>> 
>>> Dropping the NUCs may be another of their less than stellar decisions
>>> although the marketing wasn't great.
>> 
>> Overpriced attempt to compete with the Raspberry Pi. Intel probably lost
>> money on every one they sold.
>
> I might go along with overpriced but most variations weren't in the same 
> league as the Pi. That's not taking anything away from the Pi but it's a 
> whole different game. From the reviews the Pi 5 is almost acceptable as a 
> general purpose desktop but that still isn't what its principle purpose 
> is. 

The original Pi computers that existed when the NUC came out had much lower 
specs. I don't know anything about the Pi 5. I do know that, when you start 
adding up all the bits and pieces required to make Pi into a usable 
computer, they turn to not be all that cheap. If you just want a small 
computer, you're better off buying a used Micro computer. I even bought a a 
few Wyse smart terminals that are more powerful than Pi computers (for about 
$20 to $30 complete). They run Linux well.

-- 
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy 
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.”  —J.R.R. Tolkien