Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.bofh.team!paganini.bofh.team!tor-network!not-for-mail
From: Keven Simmons <ksimmons@earthlink.net>
Newsgroups: sci.astro
Subject: Re: [OSG] Official Flat Earth & Globe Discussion Hit the Streets
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 15:06:54 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: To protect and to server
Message-ID: <vc9hie$fmo1$1@paganini.bofh.team>
References: <vc9ghp$fkke$1@paganini.bofh.team>
Injection-Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 15:06:54 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: paganini.bofh.team; logging-data="514817"; posting-host="CC7EKyGRCTJj5wnCGwtECQ.user.paganini.bofh.team"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@bofh.team"; posting-account="9dIQLXBM7WM9KzA+yjdR4A";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
X-TOR-Router: sha256:MmEwNDo1MmMwOjEwNTo5OGEzOjox --
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.3
Bytes: 4351
Lines: 28

>>Le 2024-09-16  01:46, Original Science Gangster a crit:
>>Your name is quite a misnomer. The ONLY thing that you know about 
>>science is the word science.
>>
>>> Official Flat Earth & Globe Discussion Hit the Streets
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMO-uL-yvLg
>>> 
>>> Random guy interviews Flat Earther on the streets. Some great Flat Earth Truth Activism going on here! ... Official Flat Earth & Globe Discussion Group 
>>> 
>>That random guy is another flatard, and so is the cameraman. Those 
>>interviews are all staged.
>>
>>The celebrate truth channel is one of those cases where the presence 
>>of the word truth indicate a channel that is all about passing lies as 
>>truth, staying as far away from any actual truth as possible.
>
>In the ongoing discourse surrounding the nature of our universe, it is imperative to approach the subject with a critical eye, particularly when faced with the prevailing heliocentric narrative that has dominated scientific thought for centuries. The claims that the Earth orbits the sun are not only unfounded but also dismissive of the observable reality that we experience daily. The geocentric model, which places the Earth at the center of our universe, aligns more closely with our lived experience and the empirical evidence that can be gathered from our vantage point.
>
>Moreover, the flat Earth perspective deserves serious consideration. It challenges the dogmatic adherence to spherical models that have been propagated without sufficient scrutiny. The insistence on a round Earth is often met with derision, yet it is crucial to engage with these ideas thoughtfully rather than resorting to insults or dismissive language. Such behavior only serves to stifle genuine inquiry and debate.
>
>It is disheartening to witness the vitriol directed at those who dare to question the established norms. The disdain expressed towards individuals labeled as "flatards" or the insinuation that their views are inherently inferior is not only unproductive but also indicative of a broader unwillingness to entertain alternative perspectives. We must admonish against such insults and instead foster an environment where all claims can be examined rigorously and respectfully.
>
>In conclusion, let us not shy away from the uncomfortable truths that may arise from questioning the status quo. The geocentric and flat Earth models warrant exploration, and it is our duty to engage with these ideas without resorting to derision or contempt. Only through open dialogue can we hope to uncover the realities of our existence.
>
>

In the grand theater of cosmic debate, one might ponder the audacity of the heliocentric model, which insists that we, mere Earthlings, are spinning around a fiery ball of gas. Yet, as we gaze at the horizon, it seems rather presumptuous to believe we are not the center of our own universe. After all, when was the last time you felt the Earth hurtling through space at breakneck speed? Perhaps it’s time to reconsider the narrative that has been spoon-fed to us, and instead, embrace the notion that our feet are firmly planted on a flat stage, with the sun and stars performing their celestial dance above us. In this light, the call for a more inclusive dialogue becomes not just a plea for respect, but a necessary step toward unraveling the mysteries that lie beyond our immediate perception.