Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vcda96$3p3a7$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Is Intel exceptionally unsuccessful as an architecture designer?
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 01:27:03 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <vcda96$3p3a7$2@dont-email.me>
References: <memo.20240913205156.19028s@jgd.cix.co.uk>
	<vcd3ds$3o6ae$2@dont-email.me>
	<2935676af968e40e7cad204d40cafdcf@www.novabbs.org>
	<vcd7pr$3op6a$3@dont-email.me>
	<a20365f1bdcad769edd9e1f840edb2fe@www.novabbs.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 03:27:03 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="04e690265ee58abf5342f4cc1c20eee2";
	logging-data="3968327"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+BZHBCabN9OF8vX1HWdIKg"
User-Agent: Pan/0.160 (Toresk; )
Cancel-Lock: sha1:KBgzf6bX0pCnxKqjU8hLE1lH/bA=
Bytes: 2184

On Wed, 18 Sep 2024 00:57:59 +0000, MitchAlsup1 wrote:

> On Wed, 18 Sep 2024 0:44:44 +0000, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, 17 Sep 2024 23:45:50 +0000, MitchAlsup1 wrote:
>>
>>> "the CPUs are simply I/O managers to the Inference Engines and GPUs."
>>
>> That particular Wheel of Reincarnation will never turn that way.
>>
>> Why? It comes down to RAM. Those addon processors will never have
>> access to the sheer quantity of RAM that is available to the CPU. And
>> motherboard-based CPU RAM is upgradeable, as well, whereas addon cards
>> tend not to offer this option.
> 
> He showed a die figure with 256GB of DRAM stacked 8-deep and 2×4-wide.

Was it upgradeable? Or was it soldered in?

> ... all the CPU has to
> do is program the I/O MMU to allow them to do their own thing, and deal
> with the keyboard and mouse activities.

That’s not how interactive timesharing worked in the old days, and it 
certainly won’t be sufficient for interactive work today.

You *did* say “servers” though, didh’t you?