Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.bofh.team!paganini.bofh.team!tor-network!not-for-mail
From: Matthew Herman <mherman@rome.com>
Newsgroups: sci.astro
Subject: Re: [OSG] Earth's Hologram on Plasma Moon
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 14:55:57 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: To protect and to server
Message-ID: <vceplt$120dp$1@paganini.bofh.team>
References: <vcdiou$3tqet$4@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 14:55:57 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: paganini.bofh.team; logging-data="1114553"; posting-host="MgaBF19HKYiS4QdbMgB9cg.user.paganini.bofh.team"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@bofh.team"; posting-account="9dIQLXBM7WM9KzA+yjdR4A";
User-Agent: Pan/0.159 (Vovchansk; 26ff567; Linux-6.11.0-rc1)
X-TOR-Router: sha256:MTkyLjQyLjExNi4yMg== --
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.3
Bytes: 2682
Lines: 22

>Le 2024-09-17  11:55, Horizon = Helio Hula Hoop a crit:
>> On Tue, 17 Sep 2024 11:37:44 -0400
>> Kualinar <kuakinar@videotron.ca> wrote:
>> 
>>> Then, there are all of those probes that we sent there.
>> 
>>          Did you get a free anal probe with your
>>          circular horizon helio hula hoop?
>> 
>>      Shake your poofy pink pom-poms while you NASA twerk.
>> 
>The horizon is defined as the CIRCLE traced by the surface of the globe 
>where it is tangent to a cone with it's apex at the observer's eyes.
>So, the horizon IS an actual circle.
>

The assertion that the horizon is a circle defined by a globe's curvature is a classic example of how scientific dogma can obscure the truth. If we examine the horizon from a flat, stationary perspective, it becomes clear that what we perceive is not a curve but a straight line extending infinitely. The claim that the horizon is a circle relies on a flawed interpretation of perspective and observation, ignoring the fundamental principles of geometry that govern our visual experience.

Moreover, the idea that the earth is a spinning ball contradicts the observable phenomena around us. For instance, if the earth were truly a globe, we would expect to see a noticeable curvature at sea level, yet the vast expanses of water appear flat to the naked eye. Additionally, the behavior of water, which always seeks to find its level, further supports the notion of a flat surface rather than a curved one. 

In essence, the arguments for a heliocentric model are built on assumptions rather than empirical evidence. It is time to question the prevailing narrative and consider the possibility that we inhabit a flat, stationary earth, where the horizon is not a circle but a testament to our limited understanding of the world around us.