Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vcjc3j$115k1$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: OT: Chinese tokamak
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 18:34:49 +1000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 70
Message-ID: <vcjc3j$115k1$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vcgs3b$ejb1$1@solani.org>
 <4udoejpkbsslc7jtm8864p1e6aqj1g0u4u@4ax.com> <vchh8g$f0v5$1@solani.org>
 <ddioej5a4ub2ie5fh6ib2hlgbopthlkm8m@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 10:35:00 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7b117620159c4b65d3b4ef309a20ea5f";
	logging-data="1087105"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+XeNaEQNXBGUeiv41vLRYDoiIRnmh7Z7I="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:H7Wq6g3RzwXjCVp8pSzkkIXVAdY=
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Content-Language: en-US
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 240919-8, 20/9/2024), Outbound message
In-Reply-To: <ddioej5a4ub2ie5fh6ib2hlgbopthlkm8m@4ax.com>
Bytes: 4227

On 20/09/2024 2:00 am, john larkin wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Sep 2024 15:50:40 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
> wrote:
> 
>> On a sunny day (Thu, 19 Sep 2024 07:41:35 -0700) it happened john larkin
>> <JL@gct.com> wrote in <4udoejpkbsslc7jtm8864p1e6aqj1g0u4u@4ax.com>:
>>
>>> On Thu, 19 Sep 2024 09:49:30 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The US led on nuclear fusion for decades.
>>>> Now China is in position to win the race:
>>>> https://edition.cnn.com/2024/09/19/climate/nuclear-fusion-clean-energy-china-us/index.html
>>>>
>>>> China's EAST tokamak in Hefei held plasma stable at 70 million degrees Celsius
>>>> - five times hotter than the core of the sun - for more than 17 minutes,
>>>> a world record and an objectively astonishing breakthrough.
>>>
>>> Sounds expensive and useless, like the Chinese moon landings.
>>
>>
>>> Feed the kids first.
>>
>> Once they have Mars they will ask for you 'merrican tourists to pay in Chinese currency and feed their kids
>> in the Martian settlements with stuff they import from Russia.
>> By that time chances are likely 'merrica's You Ash of AAAAh will no longer be,...
>> just a few settlements...grasshuts, wigwams, greens ruling.
>>
>> China is not doing bad feeding and housing their people,
>> US homelesness and poverty is
>> https://www2.cbn.com/news/us/china-moves-dominate-world-food-supply-food-power
> 
> The real concept there is not "food", it's "dominate."
> 
> https://www.wfp.org/countries/china
> 
> Communism always evolves to rule by psychopathic thugs.

The you need to explain Gorbachov, who wasn't any kind of psychopathic thug.

> A lot of the US homeless problem is caused by Chinese drugs. By
> design.

Please explain how the Chinese satisfying the US demand for drugs of 
addiction is part of some cunning Chinese plan to over-throw the US.

The US homelessness problem is caused by the US addiction to gross 
economic inequality. The bottom end of the US economic pyramid lead 
miserable lives which does make them susceptible to drugs of addiction, 
but that market is supplied by the whole world, not just China.

It is essentially created by well-off Americans insisting on being much 
more well-off than their poorer neighbours, and that isn't a feature 
that was designed into the US system - rather it's a fundamental flaw of 
a system designed on the basis that the people that owned the country 
should control the country.

A large market for drugs of addiction - as well as weakness for lying 
demagogues like Donald Trump - is part and parcel of the US 
constitutional set-up, which always was the MS/DOS of modern political 
system, and is severely in need of an up-grade.

The German constitution of 1948 is probably the best example around. The 
French constitution from 1956 is ostensibly more modern, but De Gaulle 
fudged it to suit his own silly ideas, and it really doesn't work all 
that well.

-- 
Bill Sloman, Sydney