Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news.in-chemnitz.de!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Is Intel exceptionally unsuccessful as an architecture designer?
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2024 02:12:31 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <vcnuef$1vkui$6@dont-email.me>
References: <memo.20240913205156.19028s@jgd.cix.co.uk>
	<vcd3ds$3o6ae$2@dont-email.me>
	<2935676af968e40e7cad204d40cafdcf@www.novabbs.org>
	<vcd7pr$3op6a$3@dont-email.me>
	<a20365f1bdcad769edd9e1f840edb2fe@www.novabbs.org>
	<vcda96$3p3a7$2@dont-email.me>
	<21028ed32d20f0eea9a754fafdb64e45@www.novabbs.org>
	<RECGO.45463$xO0f.22925@fx48.iad> <20240918190027.00003e4e@yahoo.com>
	<vcfp2q$8glq$5@dont-email.me> <jwv34lumjz7.fsf-monnier+comp.arch@gnu.org>
	<vckpkg$18k7r$2@dont-email.me> <vckqus$18j12$2@dont-email.me>
	<vclvsa$1hf82$6@dont-email.me> <vcnabb$1nlod$3@dont-email.me>
	<vcnl6g$1p6a3$4@dont-email.me> <20240922025721.00002910@yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2024 04:12:32 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f08cca55e0d941314925e901504a6690";
	logging-data="2085842"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19oPSPY2Srt/mTkoxF9E+ka"
User-Agent: Pan/0.160 (Toresk; )
Cancel-Lock: sha1:G3VMKO+zMtNs743WAXbyUBtgKoI=
Bytes: 2426

On Sun, 22 Sep 2024 02:57:21 +0300, Michael S wrote:

> On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 23:34:40 -0000 (UTC)
>>
> Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 13:29:31 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> 
>> > CPU's that are hyper close to the memory is good wrt locality.
>> > However, the programming for it might turn some programmers off.
>> > NUMA like for sure.
>> 
>> I’m pretty sure those multi-million-node Linux supers that fill the top
>> of the Top500 list have a NUMA-style memory-addressing model.
> 
> You are wrong.
> Last ccNuma was pushed out of top100 more than a decade ago.
> All top machines today are MPP or clusters.
> Not that a diffference between the two is well-defined.

If the difference is not “well-defined”, then how can I be “wrong”?