Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv,rec.music.misc
Subject: Re: "F-You": Megyn Kelly Blasts Taylor Swift Endorsement Of Kamala
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2024 18:49:32 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 136
Message-ID: <vcq6tu$2cmei$1@dont-email.me>
References: <atropos-5371B3.11385014092024@69.muaa.rchm.washdctt.dsl.att.net>
 <csslejlia8i4o4k31hlh6ii8el30l50t91@4ax.com> <vceu3n$49jg$1@dont-email.me>
 <vceuea$basv$1@solani.org> <vcevf2$49jg$4@dont-email.me>
 <vcf3ij$djs2$1@solani.org> <vcfcct$6ip7$3@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-669738.14444722092024@news.giganews.com>
Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 00:49:35 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="bf3e72a33ca43367950d3e7166f310ab";
	logging-data="2513362"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/uLetRCRRaZrydzUj0uzQSRxC1MVCAyUU="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:iciVXbHo9E+86fAkX13TjwHHVyE=
In-Reply-To: <atropos-669738.14444722092024@news.giganews.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 7242

On 9/22/2024 5:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <vcfcct$6ip7$3@dont-email.me>, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> On 9/18/2024 1:44 PM, suzeeq wrote:
>>>
>>> On 9/18/2024 9:34 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>> On Sep 18, 2024 at 9:17:14 AM PDT, "suzeeq" <suzeeq@imbris.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 9/18/2024 9:11 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>    On Sep 18, 2024 at 8:41:07 AM PDT, "shawn"
>>>>>> <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
> 
>>>>>>> Especially given how electric vehicles behave when it turns really
>>>>>>> cold. Not something you want when even your nearest neighbor may be
>>>>>>> miles away.
> 
>>>>>> Not a concern for Gavvy. We have plenty of places that get snow
>>>>>> and freezing temps in California but the Climate Cult doesn't care.
> 
>>>>> Not like in the northern tier of states, where temps are often below
>>>>> zero, and sometimes down to -40 with the wind chill.
>>>>
>>>> At an average of 411.5 inches per year, Donner Pass, California, is
>>>> one of the snowiest places in the contiguous United States. Four
>>>> times since 1880 total snowfall at Donner Summit has exceeded 775
>>>> inches and topped 800 inches in both 1938 and 1952. Winds in the
>>>> pass can also become extreme and wind gusts in excess of 100 miles
>>>> per hour are common during winter storms. Winter temperatures in the
>>>> area often drop below 0°F for weeks at a time each year;
>>>> the all-time record low for California of -45°F (real temperature
>>>> without wind chill) was recorded in the Sierra Nevada in the area
>>>> around the Donner Pass in January 1937.
>>>>
>>> I know, I used to live on the N shore of Tahoe in the late 1970s.
>>> However, it seldom gets that cold there anymore. When the temps gets
>>> below 0 it's only for a week. You're quoting conditions tat haven't been
>>> see for 70 to 85 years ago. Things have changed.
>>
>> That's climate-alarmist talk. Your thermometer must be Leftist...
> 
> Looks like it's time for Part 2 in my "How the Media and Democrats Lie
> to You" series. Earlier I detailed how they lie to you about crime. This
> time we'll learn  how they lie to you about 'climate change'.
> 
> The L.A. Times recently published the latest in what seems to be a
> never-ending series designed to scare you into converting to the Climate
> Cult.
> 
> https://www.latimes.com/environment/story/2024-09-09/hotter-drier-differe
> nt-how-climate-change-will-alter-l-a
> 
> Basically, it's all about how 'climate change' will alter your life in
> L.A:
> 
> "Will it be a fiery landscape where sizzling sidewalks cause
> second-degree burns, wildfire smoke blots out the sun, and water flows
> only sometimes, and mostly not at all? Or will California's penchant for
> innovation be our salvation?"
> 
> ("Salvation"... notice the religious tones and connotations associated
> with stories like this.)
> 
> "The youth of our planet will have to live in the environment we've
> created for them but there's still time to seize control of our
> collective destiny."
> 
> ("Collective"... notice the socialist/communist verbiage associated with
> stories like this.)
> 
> The article and all others like it are peppered with dire claims about
> heat records being blown away:
> 
> "Southern California wildfires spread with record heat."
> 
> "Brutal heatwave breaks records across Southern California."
> 
> The constant drumbeat about shattered temperature records is interesting
> because they almost always just make the assertion that this is record
> heat but never actually back it up with facts.
> 
> So I went to LA Almanac.com and looked up the day-by-day record high
> temperatures in the month of September for Los Angeles.
> 
> Month/Day   Record High    Record Low
> Sep 1       110 (1955)     49 (1901)
> Sep 2       108 (1955)     51 (1881)
> Sep 3       103 (1988)     51 (1892)
> Sep 4       110 (1988)     52 (1892)
> Sep 5       105 (1984)     50 (1898)
> Sep 6       111 (2020)     48 (1898)
> Sep 7       103 (1949)     50 (1884)
> Sep 8       103 (1984)     47 (1901)
> Sep 9       102 (1956)     48 (1884)
> Sep 10      103 (1983)     52 (1893)
> Sep 11      101 (1983)     48 (1901)
> Sep 12      102 (1971)     48 (1884)
> Sep 13      106 (1971)     48 (1884)
> Sep 14      100 (2012)     48 (1898)
> Sep 15      103 (2012)     49 (1895)
> Sep 16      103 (2014)     48 (1884)
> Sep 17      108 (1913)     46 (1884)
> Sep 18      103 (1939)     48 (1884)
> Sep 19      104 (1939)     49 (1907)
> Sep 20      107 (1939)     49 (1900)
> Sep 21      108 (1885)     47 (1880)
> Sep 22      104 (1883)     48 (1895)
> Sep 23      104 (1978)     44 (1880)
> Sep 24      106 (1978)     45 (1880)
> Sep 25      107 (1978)     48 (1879)
> Sep 26      109 (1963)     48 (1893)
> Sep 27      113 (2010)     46 (1901)
> Sep 28      106 (1963)     49 (1901)
> Sep 29      102 (1999)     44 (1880)
> Sep 30      105 (1906)     48 (1886)
> 
> What can we conclude from this data?
> 
> Well, first and foremost, that the propagandists at the L.A. Times are
> full of shit. They're literally lying to promote an agenda.
> 
> September is a hot month in L.A. and has been going back to the 1800s,
> long before SUVs, carbon footprints, 'climate change'. And notably,
> while there are some record highs set post-2000, not one of them is in
> 2024, which makes the Times' claim that our current heat wave is 'record
> heat' or is 'breaking records' a complete falsehood.
> 
> And these are the people who are supposedly 'fact-checking' everything
> from your social media posts to your presidential candidates.
> 
> Who's fact-checking the fact-checkers?

The record lows occurred near or prior to the turn of last century, 
while the record highs are generally later.  Sounds like warming to me.