Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vcsssn$j17$1@panix2.panix.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.panix2.panix.com!panix2.panix.com!not-for-mail From: kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written Subject: Re: Nebula Finalists 2002 Date: 23 Sep 2024 23:16:39 -0000 Organization: Former users of Netcom shell (1989-2000) Lines: 16 Message-ID: <vcsssn$j17$1@panix2.panix.com> References: <vcru41$ouh$1@reader1.panix.com> <robertaw-E98D7B.10042323092024@news.individual.net> Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="panix2.panix.com:166.84.1.2"; logging-data="18081"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com" Bytes: 1277 jdnicoll@panix.com (James Nicoll) wrote: > > 2002: People across the interweb tubes embraced blogging, WorldCom's > earning report was inexplicably snubbed by the World Fantasy Award, > and the SARS pandemic taught the world a valuable lesson about disease > control it would surely never forget. > > Which 2002 Nebula Finalist Novels Have You Read? I have not read any of the Nebula novels but I did read Worldcom's annual report and it was... quite a thing. Didn't mention massive reputation losses due to email spam once. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."