Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vctukd$32tfb$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Ruvim <ruvim.pinka@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: Re: single-xt approach in the standard
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 12:52:29 +0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 46
Message-ID: <vctukd$32tfb$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vcts54$34hmb$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 10:52:30 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="26d220beb36d605f1d6f3332be578ae5";
	logging-data="3241451"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+KozU65lLTa3SF7yGu/tmK"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:1MJ6mKSLbcpQW9sRtTOPKyQKhXE=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vcts54$34hmb$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2214

On 2024-09-24 12:10, Gerry Jackson wrote:
> On 23/09/2024 18:02, Anton Ertl wrote:
>> mhx@iae.nl  (mhx) writes:
>>> On Mon, 23 Sep 2024 8:36:10 +0000,albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl  wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article<vcq1e5$25spg$7@dont-email.me>,
>>>> Ruvim<ruvim.pinka@gmail.com>  wrote:
>>> [..]
>>>>>    1 constant a
>>>>>    1 constant b
>>>>>    ' a ' b = .
>> ...
>>> Why? 'a' and 'b' are user defined words, '=' is a standard word,
>>> and 'true' is the expected outcome.
>> Are you sure?
>>
>> [~:152648] iforth
>> FORTH> 1 constant a  ok
>> FORTH> 1 constant b  ok
>> FORTH> ' a ' b = . 0  ok
>>
>> I actually know of no system that outputs -1.
>>
>> - anton
> 
> I know it's different but:
> 
> 1 constant a
> synonym b a
> ' a ' b = . \ displayed -1 in 5 out of 6 Forths I just tried, including 
> GForth.
> 
> Comparing xt's is unsafe
> 

The same xt means the same execution semantics and nothing more.

But the same execution semantics can be identified by different xt-s. 
Thus, from two different xt-s one cannot say whether they identify 
different execution semantics or the same execution semantics.



--
Ruvim