Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vcuml1$38i3k$2@azerty.dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!azerty.dont-email.me!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: azerty <azerty@azerty.dont-email.me>
Newsgroups: comp.edu
Subject: Re: CS-234 Discussion
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 15:42:25 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 36
Sender: root <root@255.255.255.255>
Message-ID: <vcuml1$38i3k$2@azerty.dont-email.me>
References: <vc8fq9$2lv8u$1@lhmerino.dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 17:42:25 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: azerty.dont-email.me; posting-host="d92a9460eabbd4da34e3a292ff5259f1";
	logging-data="3426420"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19jPUd2GSB1VDnN6sE2Owgu/2MrSkhXsr0="
User-Agent: tin/2.6.3-20231224 ("Banff") (Linux/6.10.0-linuxkit (aarch64))
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Sdi855n3N0W8+VvdYm2QqSaWX4c=
Bytes: 3300

CS234 <cs234@lhmerino.dont-email.me> wrote:

This thread is intended for the students of CS-234: Technologies for democratic society
> 
> How does Usenet fit into the vision presented by Licklider and Taylor in
> "The Computer as a Communication Device"?
> 
> Reflect on:
> - Which aspects of their vision are realized through Usenet?
> - What aspects have evolved differently from what they imagined?
> 
> Feel free to respond to comments made by your classmates as well.

In "The Computer as a Communication Device," Licklider and Taylor envisioned a future
where computers enabled interactive, decentralized communication, allowing individuals to
collaborate and share ideas. 
Usenet, developed in 1980, reflects many aspects of their vision. 
It provided a decentralized platform for users to post and exchange information across 
newsgroups, fostering global communication and knowledge-sharing, much like the "online
communities" Licklider and Taylor imagined.
Nevertheless, certain aspects evolved differently. 
Usenet was primarily text-based, whereas Licklider and Taylor foresaw more multimedia-rich 
communication. 
Additionally, Usenet’s lack of moderation led to issues like spam and misinformation, 
contrasting with the more idealized, constructive collaboration they envisioned. 
The rise of the modern web, with platforms like forums and social media, has since 
overshadowed Usenet, pushing communication towards more centralized and regulated environments.
In contrast to Usenet's decentralized and unregulated model, today’s social media 
platforms and forums are more tightly controlled and curated, which can promote more 
constructive discussions but also lead to concerns about censorship and corporate control. 
Usenet's open nature, while innovative, exposed the challenges of maintaining quality 
discourse without oversight. Licklider and Taylor’s vision of a digital space fostering 
creativity and collaboration remains relevant, but the way we manage and curate these 
spaces has evolved. 
The internet today reflects a hybrid of their decentralized vision with the need for 
structure, moderation, and security in large-scale communication networks.