Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Python <python@invalid.org>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_The_mathematical_Poincar=C3=A9-Lorentz_transformati?=
 =?UTF-8?Q?ons?=
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 22:47:04 +0200
Organization: CCCP
Lines: 84
Message-ID: <vcv8g8$3avt1$6@dont-email.me>
References: <42RUg_TcLuVCEPpCCJpFdI6NTVM@jntp> <vcs9r7$2q8oi$1@dont-email.me>
 <j9j1Tkqi5LGYmk5CzgXl1Ww8Qwk@jntp> <vcu6bv$365hb$1@dont-email.me>
 <humC4HOqwa8RgpL-9q5Vqw5iFsY@jntp> <vcug8l$37kdn$1@dont-email.me>
 <C9ZVACHmOnMgJMPVEMTfPtF0uBA@jntp> <vcv67d$3avt1$2@dont-email.me>
 <-1RQ6Sw8Xx8oS_AIVRs0InV8AAU@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 22:47:05 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e8aa8eb14008e8f394bd19393db167d5";
	logging-data="3506081"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18zlGCWUXUk+5R3gcY8EK8U"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:V1pO5rYVv76RsZwc94tmYo+PlxA=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <-1RQ6Sw8Xx8oS_AIVRs0InV8AAU@jntp>
Bytes: 5229

Le 24/09/2024 à 22:43, M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand a écrit :
> Le 24/09/2024 à 22:08, Python a écrit :
>>
>> Quite the opposite. They don't need hints to know you are talking
>> shit. By the way you should (you won't) think about the comparison
>> with a siren on an ambulance going forth and back. I'll post about
>> this soon, but you may want to find by yourself.
> 
> The sound Doppler effect is interesting, but well... Once again, you're 
> going to waste your time.
> You're going to show that the Doppler effect explanation works, and 
> nothing more: you're not going to get to the bottom of things.
> But you're not going to show why it works, because you take my equations 
> for total crap, despite their logic and mathematical beauty that even 
> Einstein or Poincaré didn't have.
> 
> But FUCK, that's not what's important, it's not your watermelon that's 
> going to synchronize the watches, it's not your ambulance siren, but we 
> don't care about all that.
> 
> That's not the important thing.
> 
> The important thing is to understand that the notion of a relativistic 
> frame of reference is biased if we apply it to anything other than the 
> observer himself.
> 
> The important thing is to understand that since each observer has his 
> own relativistic hyperplane of simultaneity, it is mandatory to go 
> through it to correctly and perfectly describe things.
> 
> The important thing is to understand that if we practice like this, for 
> any observer, there is a perfect fluidity of times for all observers, 
> and that talking about gap-time is particularly stupid.
> 
> What physicists do is stupid. They calculate time in the forward frame 
> of reference (measured by a point M and its synchronization) then in the 
> return frame of reference (with another point M' also placed on the 
> normal but from another incredibly different frame of reference M').
> 
> Realizing that we cannot add the return and return times, they invent a 
> tiem-gap that has absolutely no place in my home (which allows you to 
> insult me ​​when you have understood NOTHING, once again).
> 
> I have referred you dozens of times to nemo.physics where you will find 
> the perfect description of what is happening.
> 
> Such a description should make you think, after drinking two or three 
> cups of coffee, maybe you will have the tilt, the mathematical 
> illumination.
> 
> The perfection, the coherence and the beauty of the whole thing far 
> exceeds all the bullshit invented by Minkowski and those who followed 
> him, including the idiot Albert Einstein.
> 
> So if you want to show yourself up to it:
> 1. Study what I say without acting like a monkey.
> 2. Realize that it is as mind-blowing as no one has ever mind-blowed the 
> theory (to better re-mind it)
> 3. Show that you have balls and attack scientific public opinion by 
> telling them that you have understood and validated something
> that they will never be able to understand if you do not help them.
> 
> And stop with your watermelons and your ambulances, it is grotesque.
> 
> Go into the depth and clarity of things.
> 
> With your ambulances, you will never be able to make them understand 
> that the road on which the ambulance is driving is a reference mollusk, 
> and that it is no longer the same depending on the speed.
> 
> They will never be able to understand that if there are twelve km to go, 
> the ambulance will have to travel thirty-six, and that those who call me 
> a monkey without having understood the beauty and logic of reasoning 
> (see my little comics on Nemo) are themselves arrogant monkeys, 
> criticizing a stroke of genius that they have not even understood and 
> that they cannot even explain.
> 
> R.H.

Complete madness, oh God !

I'll post the ambulance-siren comparison though.