Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
Subject: Re: Whoops! The Atlantic Makes Trump Look EPIC In Cover Intended as a
 Smear
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 18:06:36 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 57
Message-ID: <vcvd5t$3c15n$1@dont-email.me>
References: <20240913a@crcomp.net> <vcfkj6$7u9m$2@dont-email.me>
 <44ba55b0-9667-f511-e884-e91e2078a4e0@example.net>
 <vci73c$o1qv$1@dont-email.me>
 <747b854a-2622-4162-68ac-159a85d14140@example.net>
 <vcku7i$19c9j$1@dont-email.me>
 <3da82988-b240-b700-4ec9-f5378d3480af@example.net>
 <vcnc8b$1o122$1@dont-email.me>
 <4da12558-d945-69e4-f83a-66d1414d4cfa@example.net>
 <vcq7v6$2cr7r$1@dont-email.me>
 <34b40a5a-d168-6342-ebba-232f2ee89428@example.net>
 <55346000-2a15-c4f2-15f1-c84f0f159a78@example.net>
 <RulIO.148182$EEm7.139136@fx16.iad>
 <94dcdc09-a8ef-ce4e-b847-b1529c4a63eb@example.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 00:06:54 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1d4e25efc4a2558ebdaad7253806ef6c";
	logging-data="3540151"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19sY6ehAM6loNB2FfKdTtZd"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.19
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PW4f2pzge/2/iw1i91QCvlj8P8k=
In-Reply-To: <94dcdc09-a8ef-ce4e-b847-b1529c4a63eb@example.net>
Bytes: 3585

D wrote:
> 
> 
> On Mon, 23 Sep 2024, Scott Lurndal wrote:
> 
>> D <nospam@example.net> writes:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 23 Sep 2024, D wrote:
>>>
>>>>> These models have done a good job of simulating past climates, from 
>>>>> the ice
>>>>> ages to Eocene warmth, to Pangean Monsoons and Holocene lake levels 
>>>>> in east
>>>>> Africa.  Your source here is simply incorrect.
>>>>>
>>>>> They have also made the above correct predictions (do I have to 
>>>>> repeat them
>>>>> for the tenth time?).  Neither of the ideas you propose above have 
>>>>> made any
>>>>> correct predictions.
>>>>>
>>>>> "Flawed" has become a word which means nothing more than "I disagree".
>>>>> It is meaningless without being able to point to an actual flaw.
>>>>
>>>> Incorrect. They are just models, and past patterns do not guarantee
>>>> future performance. It is easy to create any model you want, to show 
>>>> any
>>>> result you need.
>>>>
>>>> This reliance on models instead of proof, is another huge weakness of
>>>> climatologists and completely undermines their theories.
>>>
>>> Good evening William, I found a great article on the unreliability of
>>> models and why we cannot rely on them. I hope you enjoy the read!
>>
>> William wrote  that he participated in the development of
>> the models.   The Hoover institute doesn't do scientific research,
>> nor does it employ scientists.   The author of the report you
>> quoted is an economist, the other works for a pharmaceutical company.
>>
>>
>> (BTW - did you get permission to respost the copyrighted content
>> you lifted from their website)?
>>
> 
> Anything about the content or only meta?

Yes, it's crap.


Better presented than your stuff, but still full of lies, distortions 
and omissions.

Nothing new, in other words.


William Hyde