Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no>
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Microsoft makes a lot of money, Is Intel exceptionally
 unsuccessful as an architecture designer?
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 11:38:36 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <vd0lms$3keo5$3@dont-email.me>
References: <memo.20240913205156.19028s@jgd.cix.co.uk>
 <vcd7lo$3op6a$2@dont-email.me> <vcdele$293s$1@gal.iecc.com>
 <vcdstq$3vei1$1@dont-email.me> <vcfdld$525$1@gal.iecc.com>
 <vcfu73$9bc9$2@dont-email.me> <vcgiq7$fmaa$3@dont-email.me>
 <87h6ab33p3.fsf@localhost> <vcid1g$ov66$5@dont-email.me>
 <ca3a58a82e35cb494662818a4c8f3e2a@www.novabbs.org>
 <vcj2ln$vddu$2@dont-email.me> <vcm6jn$1igur$1@dont-email.me>
 <vcrflb$2lnor$4@dont-email.me> <vct2hp$2tic0$12@dont-email.me>
 <451b6f3b701e89f1664e6594ce8bfead@www.novabbs.org>
 <vcute7$39icl$2@dont-email.me>
 <7523c2065d4e28fb0350376cb5b08d04@www.novabbs.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 11:38:37 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a2acf96c5a9971767ae2525d632c7259";
	logging-data="3816197"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX197yzL9vZQQa0Kebb6OhscHD+umLdOT+yw="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.11.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:bdAPOc3jSRyxKqRd5Hg3q0I/9eg=
In-Reply-To: <7523c2065d4e28fb0350376cb5b08d04@www.novabbs.org>
Content-Language: en-GB
Bytes: 2929

On 24/09/2024 20:02, MitchAlsup1 wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 17:38:15 +0000, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> 
>> MitchAlsup1 <mitchalsup@aol.com> schrieb:
>>> On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 0:53:14 +0000, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>>>
>>>> Anybody producing large amounts of high-quality, complex textual
>>>> material > (e.g. technical documentation) is inevitably going to
>>>> have to move beyond WYSIWYG tools and adopt some kind of markup
>>>> system.
>>>
>>> I disagree.
>>>
>>> Word is just fine as long as all your drawings are *.jpg.
>>>
>>> What feature do you think is missing ??
>>
>> I intensely dislike jpeg drawings in Word. They blow up the
>> file size and are still limited in resolution.  Vector files
>> are better.
> 
> I have had problems with vector drawings where lines meet
> they don't. *.jpg salves that problem. I also use *.jpg
> out of eXcel as it is more compatible with Word than
> direct.
> 
> And there is a control variable in Word that does *.jpgs
> at 200 d/i which you can change to whatever you like.
> 

If you are talking about drawings, rather than photographs, then png 
would be a better choice than jpg.  (Assuming, of course, that Word 
supports png...)