Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net>
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Re: Extensive article on Rivendell and Grant Petersen
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 11:13:59 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <vd19bn$3narv$6@dont-email.me>
References: <VEfIO.1095856$azJ4.449168@fx16.ams4>
 <vcsa02$2q622$1@dont-email.me> <boc3fjlebcqkp6iefao8a13js0nbj8gu50@4ax.com>
 <hqjIO.327263$hKDf.37988@fx07.ams4>
 <l2h3fjdkfie6ht4dscca6n3ulq7thv0l0k@4ax.com> <vcsipj$2rfcq$2@dont-email.me>
 <blm3fj1rj43cu4465m83on9pq3ul18ir0p@4ax.com> <vcsmlk$2s44j$1@dont-email.me>
 <vct3ic$2tr2a$1@dont-email.me> <sls4fj914qnt9is0crvsd4dpli978v8ebt@4ax.com>
 <vcubuh$371aj$1@dont-email.me> <vcupam$38ujo$1@dont-email.me>
 <vcv02t$39ji0$6@dont-email.me> <s546fj9c375qeahc31ji628iks5ve242f2@4ax.com>
 <vcvr6f$3hhf0$2@dont-email.me> <vd11ua$3mkcm$1@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: frkrygow@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 17:14:00 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f4dff14032ac6234f6314049b8fe3ff9";
	logging-data="3910527"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18ty2URxSnCPyoPVVz36VpqBDaUWpBsCzQ="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:/JWfn3ugfUu8TGi7LEgO0vr/VWM=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vd11ua$3mkcm$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2778

On 9/25/2024 9:07 AM, AMuzi wrote:
> On 9/24/2024 9:06 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
>> On 9/24/2024 3:21 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
>>> On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 14:23:25 -0400, Frank Krygowski
>>> <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 9/24/2024 12:28 PM, sms wrote:
>>>>> On 9/24/2024 5:39 AM, AMuzi wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>> 'Best' ought to be followed by 'to what purpose?' or 'for whom?'.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's best when you can explain to someone why you made the choices you
>>>>> did and why they might or might not also be the right choices for 
>>>>> them.
>>>> And when someone's explanation for their choices involves factual
>>>> mistakes, what should our reaction be?
>>>>
>>>> "Of course you're right. Red bikes are always faster!"
>>>>
>>>> Not every opinion is correct.
>>>
>>> It might be right for them. Their opinion is all that matters to them.
>>> I know that's hard for you to understand.
>>
>> Right. Red bikes really are faster for "them"?
>>
>>
> 
> Celeste beats Red.
> 
Oops, I forgot that!

-- 
- Frank Krygowski