Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vd1obq$2jkce$3@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: is Vax addressing sane today
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 12:30:02 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <vd1obq$2jkce$3@dont-email.me>
References: <vbd6b9$g147$1@dont-email.me>
 <2024Sep10.094353@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <vckf9d$178f2$1@dont-email.me>
 <O2DHO.184073$kxD8.113118@fx11.iad> <vcso7k$2s2da$1@dont-email.me>
 <3b7a257101d09e1995314aadace0e14f@www.novabbs.org>
 <vctklf$33me0$2@dont-email.me> <vcurij$2jkce$2@dont-email.me>
 <93cbf6da3d60952471668b3cc5dc61f9@www.novabbs.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 21:30:02 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="712df838b41f4ba9af5c9561f5afb4e2";
	logging-data="2740622"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+DLK5aJli6aCRrqbVmXSnhhE7+r5oOvKo="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:p837SWbVvgruoqdEae2mG6mGGEM=
In-Reply-To: <93cbf6da3d60952471668b3cc5dc61f9@www.novabbs.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2256

On 9/24/2024 10:57 AM, MitchAlsup1 wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 17:06:27 +0000, Stephen Fuld wrote:
> 
>> On 9/23/2024 11:02 PM, Terje Mathisen wrote:
>>
>> snip
>>
>>> Maybe all add/sub/etc opcodes that are immediately followed by an INTO
>>> could be fused into a single ADDO/SUBO/etc version that takes zero extra
>>> cycles as long as the trap part isn't hit?
>>
>> If you are going to do that, why not make it an optional prefix byte?
>> That way, no fusion needed, no extra cycles, yet the same amount of code
>> space.
> 
> Realistically, what is the difference if INTO is a prefix
> byte or a postfix byte ?

Of course, IANAHG, but my guess was that not having to do instruction 
fusion was worth something, and my suggestion has zero cost.  If this is 
wrong, then there is no difference.




-- 
  - Stephen Fuld
(e-mail address disguised to prevent spam)