Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <vd200f$cgp$1@gal.iecc.com>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vd200f$cgp$1@gal.iecc.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!news.iecc.com!.POSTED.news.iecc.com!not-for-mail
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,alt.folklore.computers
Subject: Re: The joy of FORTRAN
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 21:40:31 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Taughannock Networks
Message-ID: <vd200f$cgp$1@gal.iecc.com>
References: <pan$96411$d204da43$cc34bb91$1fe98651@linux.rocks> <6tDIO.25202$afc4.3071@fx42.iad> <vd1gte$bs7$1@gal.iecc.com> <vd1v01$3r2r4$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 21:40:31 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970";
	logging-data="12825"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com"
In-Reply-To: <pan$96411$d204da43$cc34bb91$1fe98651@linux.rocks> <6tDIO.25202$afc4.3071@fx42.iad> <vd1gte$bs7$1@gal.iecc.com> <vd1v01$3r2r4$2@dont-email.me>
Cleverness: some
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Originator: johnl@iecc.com (John Levine)
Bytes: 1945
Lines: 20

According to Lawrence D'Oliveiro  <ldo@nz.invalid>:
>On Wed, 25 Sep 2024 17:22:54 -0000 (UTC), John Levine wrote:
>
>> COBOL had (has) very powerful data structures ...
>
>No pointers, no typedefs, no dynamic arrays, no array lower bounds other 
>than 1, no parametric types ...

It was 1960.  Fortran had arrays of numbers, COBOL had structures including
arrays of structures.  If your point is that we have figured stuff out in
the following 60 years, well, yes, we have.

I guess Algol60 had dynamic arrays but no structures which limited how
useful they were.  And the call-by-name mistake made implementation very
painful.


-- 
Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly