Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vd4800$arc8$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: Futexes ain't fast
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 11:09:03 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <vd4800$arc8$1@dont-email.me>
References: <van414$3fe9t$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <vashj8$gpjk$1@dont-email.me>
 <vasp6h$i41a$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <vat7db$k5je$6@dont-email.me>
 <vat8i6$kjk5$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <vat8kk$kjrl$1@dont-email.me>
 <vd427l$8io1$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <vd46af$93f5$1@dont-email.me>
 <vd46gr$ajf8$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <vd46q6$93f5$3@dont-email.me>
 <vd475a$ampp$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 20:09:04 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="70a24908b7fe7d4940831be9570b7dea";
	logging-data="355720"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+oW2I4Y9SyVfBvEiUIL7YasEEYBWt9sKo="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:zt6OYR/au28une0mnnUF+MPVwZw=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vd475a$ampp$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>

On 9/26/2024 10:54 AM, Bonita Montero wrote:
> Am 26.09.2024 um 19:48 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:
> 
>> On 9/26/2024 10:44 AM, Bonita Montero wrote:
> 
>>> Adaptive mutexes often don't make any sense. The locking-frequency has
>>> to be high and the locked-interval needs to be very short to make spin-
>>> ning likely to succeed. That's both not often.
> 
>> Adaptive mutexes with the right spin counts do make a difference!
> 
> Only under the rare circumstances I've shown.
> 
>> I just showed you one use of try_lock. This is just one out of many. 
>> try_lock is useful.
> 
> No one needs try_lock.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Yawn...