Article <vd498m$b1vu$1@dont-email.me>

Deutsch English Français Italiano
<vd498m$b1vu$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article
Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.szaf.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail
From: RonO <rokimoto557@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: talk.origins
Subject: The future of intelligent design creationism
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 13:30:44 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 64
Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org
Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org
Message-ID: <vd498m$b1vu$1@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: rokimoto557@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89";
	logging-data="86566"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
Cancel-Lock: sha1:f4dqTDx6CO6lda3p9ehbtk5+0/0=
Content-Language: en-US
	FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,
	FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED,
	RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
	smtp.eternal-september.org
Bytes: 5439

Google generative AI produced this overview when I use the thread title 
to search using Google:

QUOTE:
The future of intelligent design (ID) and creationism is likely to see a 
decline in the number of cases for which ID is invoked as an 
explanation, as better evolutionary explanations are developed. This is 
because ID is not a valid scientific theory, as it cannot be tested or 
used to make predictions.

Here are some reasons why ID is not considered a valid scientific theory:
Lack of testable predictions
ID proponents point to holes in evolution, but they don't provide 
details that would allow for scientific testing or predictions.

Unclear boundaries
ID theorists don't clearly define where evolution ends and ID begins.

Lack of evidence
ID proponents point to phenomena like the Cambrian explosion, but they 
don't provide evidence that these phenomena can't be explained by 
evolution.

Challenges to the concept of intelligence
Evolutionary algorithms demonstrate that complex structures can evolve 
through randomness and selection, without the need for a designer.

ID is a pseudoscientific movement that promotes the idea that life is 
too complex to have evolved without the intervention of a supernatural 
being.

Generative AI is experimental.
END QUOTE:

Unlike ChatGPT the Google AI seems to post conclusions derived from what 
it has been fed about intelligent design.  ChatGPT would post the ID 
perp claims as if they had some validity, but the Google AI seems to 
have decided not to include the bogus claims, and instead go with the 
public consensus.

You still get the same search results like the Christian Post article on 
the future of intelligent design that I have put up a couple times on TO 
and the older negative commentary by the NCSE.

It should be noted that the first paragraph reflects the fact that there 
has been 100% failure for god-did-it-explanations in science.  They have 
never been scientifically testable at the time that they were proposed, 
and we have had to do the hard work in figuring out what really happened 
or is going on.  The earth isn't flat, there is no firmament above us, 
the geocentric universe does not exist, the earth is much older than 
creationist literalistic claims, no global flood, the order of creation 
is wrong.  100% failure and no god-did-it successes.  Nothing that we 
have been able to verify as a possible god-did-it success has ever gone 
onto the god's side of the ledger upon verification.  The Google AI is 
able to take what has been happening and predict a likely future for the 
ID scam.  The ID perps and IDiotic creationists that fell for the ID 
scam have never been able to do that.

I do not know what triggers these google AI summaries.  They might only 
occur if the AI has enough input to compose something.

Ron Okimoto