Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vd54jp$e44c$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Arne_Vajh=C3=B8j?= <arne@vajhoej.dk> Newsgroups: comp.os.vms Subject: Re: Apache + mod_php performance Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 22:17:29 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 24 Message-ID: <vd54jp$e44c$1@dont-email.me> References: <vcv0bl$39mnj$1@dont-email.me> <vcvmu1$3cnv1$2@dont-email.me> <vd10re$nmp$1@reader1.panix.com> <vd1bdp$3npm3$1@dont-email.me> <vd1lgd$dbq$1@reader1.panix.com> <vd1u8j$3qqpg$1@dont-email.me> <vd25hj$3s2q8$1@dont-email.me> <vd3kkb$66dq$1@dont-email.me> <vd3r5d$74q1$1@dont-email.me> <vd5196$e44d$1@dont-email.me> <vd51kr$i6sg$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 04:17:29 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1c0eb99617403d5d511f3f96ce19037b"; logging-data="462988"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/jDJKDxr4pSJXbm6sAufINn0Sk7kx3wHE=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:CN+eguouH2HrMnqHEiND085efxk= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <vd51kr$i6sg$2@dont-email.me> Bytes: 2032 On 9/26/2024 9:26 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > On Thu, 26 Sep 2024 21:20:38 -0400, Arne Vajhøj wrote: >> A very quick search make me think that the mailbox is only used for >> control not for data. > > Could still be a bottleneck, though. If it is only used for the parent to signal the child to terminate? > That and the need for all the ASTs. Why should AST's be a problem? The "call this function when task is done" approach is a very common design today. DEC was ahead of time with that. And implementation wise then the AST's worked on VAX 700 series 45 years ago. Todays systems are extremely much faster - maybe a factor 10000 faster. Arne