Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vd77er$g8t$1@reader1.panix.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.spitfire.i.gajendra.net!not-for-mail From: cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) Newsgroups: comp.os.vms Subject: Re: Apache + mod_php performance Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 21:18:19 -0000 (UTC) Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC Message-ID: <vd77er$g8t$1@reader1.panix.com> References: <vcv0bl$39mnj$1@dont-email.me> <vd745a$q3hr$3@dont-email.me> <vd75po$cq8$1@reader1.panix.com> <vd76vd$q3hr$4@dont-email.me> Injection-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 21:18:19 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="spitfire.i.gajendra.net:166.84.136.80"; logging-data="16669"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com" X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010) Originator: cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) Bytes: 1659 Lines: 25 In article <vd76vd$q3hr$4@dont-email.me>, Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> wrote: >On 9/27/2024 4:50 PM, Dan Cross wrote: >> [snip] >> So again, to clarify, the time to issue one request against an >> otherwise idle server and retrieve a small amount of static data >> in response to that request is 17 seconds? > >Yes. > >>> As expected. >> >> It is always good to verify. I might add that there's no >> relevant environment where that's a reasonable expectation. > >I was referring the math 17 = 340 / 20. > >There is nothing reasonable about those numbers. Agreed. I reiterate my request from https://comp.os.vms.narkive.com/uWy2ouua/apache-mod-php-performance#post50: do those numbers change substantially if you send multiple queries over a single connection? - Dan C.