Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vd77er$g8t$1@reader1.panix.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.spitfire.i.gajendra.net!not-for-mail
From: cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross)
Newsgroups: comp.os.vms
Subject: Re: Apache + mod_php performance
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 21:18:19 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Message-ID: <vd77er$g8t$1@reader1.panix.com>
References: <vcv0bl$39mnj$1@dont-email.me> <vd745a$q3hr$3@dont-email.me> <vd75po$cq8$1@reader1.panix.com> <vd76vd$q3hr$4@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 21:18:19 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="spitfire.i.gajendra.net:166.84.136.80";
	logging-data="16669"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com"
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Originator: cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross)
Bytes: 1659
Lines: 25

In article <vd76vd$q3hr$4@dont-email.me>,
Arne Vajhøj  <arne@vajhoej.dk> wrote:
>On 9/27/2024 4:50 PM, Dan Cross wrote:
>> [snip]
>> So again, to clarify, the time to issue one request against an
>> otherwise idle server and retrieve a small amount of static data
>> in response to that request is 17 seconds?
>
>Yes.
>
>>> As expected.
>> 
>> It is always good to verify.  I might add that there's no
>> relevant environment where that's a reasonable expectation.
>
>I was referring the math 17 = 340 / 20.
>
>There is nothing reasonable about those numbers.

Agreed.  I reiterate my request from
https://comp.os.vms.narkive.com/uWy2ouua/apache-mod-php-performance#post50:
do those numbers change substantially if you send
multiple queries over a single connection?

	- Dan C.