Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vd7j3g$u4fv$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
Subject: Re: "Washington Post Accidentally Admits Earth at Coolest Point in
 the Last 485 Million Years"
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 20:37:04 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 60
Message-ID: <vd7j3g$u4fv$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vd549q$ig2i$3@dont-email.me>
 <28038df5-b30b-cf46-0efd-74f203f877fc@example.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2024 02:37:04 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d22d1c53751d7448683a12ffd69e686f";
	logging-data="987647"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19B3htf13GeqEPw7brFrRMM"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.19
Cancel-Lock: sha1:SCs1+gHwtNhSbKu1IcKICx7hSQk=
In-Reply-To: <28038df5-b30b-cf46-0efd-74f203f877fc@example.net>
Bytes: 3482

D wrote:
> 

> 
> I watched a documentary the other day about the fall of the akkadian 
> empire, and apparently they suspect it was due to the 4.2 kiloyear 
> event. It turns out that within 230:ish years, nature, (without any CO2) 
> changed dramatically which led to less rain, which led to food shortage. 
> Estimates say that the temperature in the region dropped 1-2 degrees C, 
> naturally in such a short time.

Did it say the global temperature dropped that much?   Or was this a 
regional event?  Regional events of this kind are common.  IIRC it is 
believed that the Mayans also ran into unfavourable climate change, 
though this is not settled.  But it's doubtless settled enough for a TV 
show.



> 
> Who would have thought that nature could change so much, without CO2?


I would.  And so would literally anybody else who spent some time 
reading on the subject.

The global temperature can be changed  rapidly by vulcanism.  An 
eruption like Pinatubo can cool the world for a short time (half a 
degree C for the norther hemisphere in this case) but the tail of the 
cooling lasts a long time, so with a series of closely spaced eruptions 
the cooling can last for decades.  One study implies that about 50% of 
the little ice age cooling was due to vulcanism.


In the historical records, eras which are very low in tropical volcano 
eruption tend to be warm.

Changes in ocean circulation can have a strong impact on regional 
climates and can occur quite rapidly, as we may discover later this 
century.  Ice age climates are even more variable, with the younger 
Dryas cooling setting in over less than five years in the Northern 
Hemisphere, cooling winters several degrees C, while leaving summers 
unaltered.    There is some reason to believe that this event was set 
off by volcanic cooling.   But at the moment that's just an idea.

Solar.  While this doesn't seem to ever amount to much, it does exist, 
and if it adds to the above, which it may have done in the little ice 
age, it can be significant.

But none of these processes is active now.


  I
> thought that was close to impossible, and that without man, nature only 
> changes on 10000 year spans. ;)

Thus you begin to learn. Keep it up.

William Hyde