| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vd9cl1$1b5kh$3@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action Subject: Re: Steam Backs Down From Forced Arbitration Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2024 09:59:14 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 48 Message-ID: <vd9cl1$1b5kh$3@dont-email.me> References: <k5iefjd73982382atbf173e19s9sc297dc@4ax.com> <vd8dfl$15ljv$1@dont-email.me> <oh4gfjlvcmauhesoi15eci7jb3ctf53sao@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2024 18:59:13 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="78717c78089cbd4f0050003780f9808b"; logging-data="1414801"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+G/o3tw88j/r6rTyPgu4l8" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:flCqOnWoA7BRp2nHuKowLyz9jig= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <oh4gfjlvcmauhesoi15eci7jb3ctf53sao@4ax.com> Bytes: 3665 On 9/28/2024 8:04 AM, Spalls Hurgenson wrote: > On Sat, 28 Sep 2024 09:07:14 +0100, JAB <noway@nochance.com> wrote: >> On 28/09/2024 01:32, Spalls Hurgenson wrote: > >>> [Fortunately, in many civilized --read, outside the USA-- >>> jurisdictions, forced arbitration is either illegal or >>> greatly restricted. So if you're in the UK, Australia >>> or many countries of the EU, any EULAs either won't have >>> any forced arbitration clauses, or if they do, those >>> clauses are unenforceable] > >> I did read about these rules in relation to Disney trying to claim that >> as a husband had signed to to Disney+ many years ago he couldn't take >> them to court after she died when they visited Disney World. My first >> thought was, that's not a good look you're putting forward there Disney >> and my second thought was, heh you can force people to go to >> arbitration, how is that even legal. > > Yeah, that's a really fascinating case. A woman died due to a severe > allergy reaction at a restaurant on Disney grounds. The restaurant not > only specified that their food was allergen free on their > (Disney-sponsored) website, but assured the woman in person that the > meal she ordered didn't have any of the forbidden foods in it. The > family sued the restaurant (which was actually an independent company > that was providing food services for Disney) for negligence, and > Disney got roped into the case because Disney's website vouched for > the restaurant. > > Meanwhile, Disney argued that because the defendants had only found > this information using their Disney account (it's a shared account > that offers access not only to the Disney+ TV and film library, but > also can be used for ticketing and reservations on Disney websites), > the forced arbitration clause of Disney+ bound the people... despite > the fact the actual reservation wasn't made through Disney+. > > Elon Musk also tried to use forced arbitration on his (former) Twitter > employees after they sued him for not giving them their severance > payments in a timely manner. But, like Steam, he had to back down when > the sheer number of arbitration claims made the costs skyrocket so it > would have cost more than actually just paying the severance. (Musk is > not the brightest of bulbs). > I don't think Musk is stupid, he just has a colossal ego and is something of a bully. -- I've done good in this world. Now I'm tired and just want to be a cranky dirty old man.