Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vd9hnb$1c03b$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: piglet <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: power supply discharge Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2024 18:25:47 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 60 Message-ID: <vd9hnb$1c03b$1@dont-email.me> References: <c5idfjp9miqru154ei6tnmg8m14qd30m6d@4ax.com> <ak1gfjdv9dlhgm2eraj7jblqimresabjnm@4ax.com> <p5egfjlmuo9cmj5qura7daj8uhr0n2khoi@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2024 20:25:47 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c0f8ed4d7aec45e8c204844bb6801044"; logging-data="1441899"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+9fdp2FmrXXtrXXwJGkfEs" User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch) Cancel-Lock: sha1:K7tFWVMPlGJOuBk1fZTAE9uNeNU= sha1:IHWCT/8YVubWzkL1Po6t+6yDgFs= Bytes: 3395 john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote: > On Sat, 28 Sep 2024 09:44:44 -0400, legg <legg@nospam.magma.ca> wrote: > >> On Fri, 27 Sep 2024 08:07:29 -0700, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> Given a benchtop power supply, you can turn the voltage up and then >>> down, and it goes down. Most have a substantial amount of output >>> capacitance, and can be driving an external cap too. So something >>> pulls the output down. >>> >>> I guess that there are no standards for this, but I've never seen a >>> supply that just hangs high when it's cranked down. >>> >>> I'm designing some programmable multi-channel power suplies and that >>> is one of many tangled issues in the project. >> >> Twiddling the adjustment knob on a bench supply doesn't >> represent a dramatic change - and most adjustible >> supplies don't load their output terminals with a >> lot of capacitance. > > I've measured a few, and got output terminal capacitance of a few > hundred to maybe 2000 uF. > > People here might measure some random power supplies. I leave them off > and connect to a 50 ohm sinewave-output function generator and find > the -3 dB point. One could use a square wave and scope the slopes too. > Keeping the amplitude low will avoid turning semi junctions on. > > A square wave source driving a cap illustrates C, ESR, and ESL on a > scope. C-meters don't usually separate the components so trend to lie, > especially with big electrolytics. > >> >> DC coupled programable supplies, or bipolar programmable >> supplies are made to drive loads in the first and third >> quadrants. >> >> There are issues in the second and fourth quadrants, where >> the supply is expected to absorb power. >> >> An amplifier driving a pure reactance experiences the same >> losses as driving a dead short. > > I don't understand that. An audio amp driving a 1 pF cap or a 1K > henry inductor would surely cause less amp losses than a short. > > Good bench power supplies should have minimal built in output capacitance; it compromises current limit performance. Anyone wanting supply decoupling caps on their test load is going to have them already at the load side anyhow. I am a fan of the HP / Harrison Labs supplies of 1960s that have no output caps and are stable. -- piglet