Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vdf197$2cedp$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
Subject: Re: OT: Chess
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 16:21:48 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 82
Message-ID: <vdf197$2cedp$1@dont-email.me>
References: <20240913a@crcomp.net>
 <ceff4cd0-7f16-0f42-588b-374e89acf00c@example.net>
 <vcfq1i$8o8k$2@dont-email.me>
 <eef9e921-3ea3-76ee-39de-e34ac66733e4@example.net>
 <vcvu4d$3hnv8$1@dont-email.me> <vd1td8$3qtr8$1@dont-email.me>
 <3ace1b93-9c34-9abb-844b-c83a66d767d5@example.net>
 <vd4g8l$c47c$1@dont-email.me>
 <6b1d3595-9da4-bd56-ba8a-082b8a10e825@example.net>
 <vd7fqf$tnof$1@dont-email.me>
 <62cf8408-2626-aedd-7ec4-601f3e2f70da@example.net>
 <vd9r0b$1d9qb$1@dont-email.me> <ctjkfjd221j3jpv998jbgen61td8p26f0v@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 22:21:59 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="95257cd148046c7bcf835bf6e84f0179";
	logging-data="2505145"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19MR39M74GAX++qyUGRBaAz"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.19
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Cbqk02+BUFvoGe/D+I0XbNxaoeQ=
In-Reply-To: <ctjkfjd221j3jpv998jbgen61td8p26f0v@4ax.com>
Bytes: 5083

The Horny Goat wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Sep 2024 17:04:11 -0400, William Hyde
> <wthyde1953@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>
>>
>> D wrote:>
>>>
>>> On Fri, 27 Sep 2024, William Hyde wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Never played that... lately I've been playing the scandinavian. I
>>>>> will meditate deeply on this!
>>>>
>>>> I do like the Scandinavian, especially the gambit variation.
>>>>
>>>> But I see videos on youtube of Magnus playing the rat.  If it gets
>>>> popular I'll have to abandon it, perhaps for the Great Snake,
>>>> Pterodactyl, or Hippopotamus.
>>>
>>> The hippo is a fascinating device! I have a book on it I haven't yet
>>> gotten around to read. I can't make up my mind if it is madness or
>>> brilliance.
>> The hippo scored a number of outstanding wins when it was first
>> systematized in the seventies (it had existed before but only as a "push
>> all pawns to the third rank" idea).  Ways were found to deal with it and
>> it's status now is that of an inferior defense.  But it you're not
>> playing against 2600 level opponents it's still quite playable.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Usually, since I do not have a lot of time to devote to chess, I prefer
>>> "easy" openings and systems such as the Colle. The colle, although
>>> easily crushed by good players, serves me well when playing other
>>> non-professional and non-amateur players like myself.
>> The Colle does not lead to a disadvantage for white.  It's problem, from
>> my point of view, is that it is a strategically unsophisticated opening
>> which is easy to equalize against.  I enjoyed playing against it as
>> black as my opening problems were soon over.
>>
>> But Colle was no fool, and the opening packs a punch.  It doesn't take
>> much in the way of carelessness for black to be facing an irresistible
>> attack after white finally achieves e4.  Nowadays I am weak enough that
>> I'd probably lose to it against any kind of strongish player.
>>
>> American Senior Master (and world poker champion) Ken Smith recommended
>> that players without the time to learn a lot of theory try either the
>> Colle or the Stonewall attack as white. When I lived in Texas both were
>> very popular with players under 2000.
>>
>> For variety, you might want to take a look at the Stonewall, both for
>> white and black.
>>
>> William Hyde
>>
>>
> When I was in high school we had a player who was one of the top 3 or
> 4 players in the club and had fallen in love with the Stonewall. So
> the rest of the stronger players (including myself) learned
> anti-Stonewall techniques and by the time I had played 100+ speed
> games against it and thought I was coming out of the opening against
> it with a pretty good game.
> 
> Am not sure I'd be happy playing my system vs anybody 2200+ but then I
> don't know any masters who play stuff like that even vs "fish" like

The Stonewall was played by Mr and Mrs Vujosevic in Toronto.  Mr V was 
well over 2100 but has zero internet presence, not even at 
chessgames.com where some weaker people of the same name are listed so I 
can't check his peak rating.  I think but am not sure that he was over 
2200.  Mrs V was a WIM, with a top FIDE rating of 2030.

Both were quite skilled at it and I learned a lot about how to deal with 
it when played by reasonably strong players in our G/15 encounters.

The newsgroups reader I am using won't let me set followups to 
rec.games.chess.misc (or more likely I just can't figure it out) but you 
may be able to.

William Hyde
> me.
>