Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vdf197$2cedp$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written Subject: Re: OT: Chess Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 16:21:48 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 82 Message-ID: <vdf197$2cedp$1@dont-email.me> References: <20240913a@crcomp.net> <ceff4cd0-7f16-0f42-588b-374e89acf00c@example.net> <vcfq1i$8o8k$2@dont-email.me> <eef9e921-3ea3-76ee-39de-e34ac66733e4@example.net> <vcvu4d$3hnv8$1@dont-email.me> <vd1td8$3qtr8$1@dont-email.me> <3ace1b93-9c34-9abb-844b-c83a66d767d5@example.net> <vd4g8l$c47c$1@dont-email.me> <6b1d3595-9da4-bd56-ba8a-082b8a10e825@example.net> <vd7fqf$tnof$1@dont-email.me> <62cf8408-2626-aedd-7ec4-601f3e2f70da@example.net> <vd9r0b$1d9qb$1@dont-email.me> <ctjkfjd221j3jpv998jbgen61td8p26f0v@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 22:21:59 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="95257cd148046c7bcf835bf6e84f0179"; logging-data="2505145"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19MR39M74GAX++qyUGRBaAz" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.19 Cancel-Lock: sha1:Cbqk02+BUFvoGe/D+I0XbNxaoeQ= In-Reply-To: <ctjkfjd221j3jpv998jbgen61td8p26f0v@4ax.com> Bytes: 5083 The Horny Goat wrote: > On Sat, 28 Sep 2024 17:04:11 -0400, William Hyde > <wthyde1953@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> D wrote:> >>> >>> On Fri, 27 Sep 2024, William Hyde wrote: >>> >>>>> Never played that... lately I've been playing the scandinavian. I >>>>> will meditate deeply on this! >>>> >>>> I do like the Scandinavian, especially the gambit variation. >>>> >>>> But I see videos on youtube of Magnus playing the rat. If it gets >>>> popular I'll have to abandon it, perhaps for the Great Snake, >>>> Pterodactyl, or Hippopotamus. >>> >>> The hippo is a fascinating device! I have a book on it I haven't yet >>> gotten around to read. I can't make up my mind if it is madness or >>> brilliance. >> The hippo scored a number of outstanding wins when it was first >> systematized in the seventies (it had existed before but only as a "push >> all pawns to the third rank" idea). Ways were found to deal with it and >> it's status now is that of an inferior defense. But it you're not >> playing against 2600 level opponents it's still quite playable. >> >> >>> >>> Usually, since I do not have a lot of time to devote to chess, I prefer >>> "easy" openings and systems such as the Colle. The colle, although >>> easily crushed by good players, serves me well when playing other >>> non-professional and non-amateur players like myself. >> The Colle does not lead to a disadvantage for white. It's problem, from >> my point of view, is that it is a strategically unsophisticated opening >> which is easy to equalize against. I enjoyed playing against it as >> black as my opening problems were soon over. >> >> But Colle was no fool, and the opening packs a punch. It doesn't take >> much in the way of carelessness for black to be facing an irresistible >> attack after white finally achieves e4. Nowadays I am weak enough that >> I'd probably lose to it against any kind of strongish player. >> >> American Senior Master (and world poker champion) Ken Smith recommended >> that players without the time to learn a lot of theory try either the >> Colle or the Stonewall attack as white. When I lived in Texas both were >> very popular with players under 2000. >> >> For variety, you might want to take a look at the Stonewall, both for >> white and black. >> >> William Hyde >> >> > When I was in high school we had a player who was one of the top 3 or > 4 players in the club and had fallen in love with the Stonewall. So > the rest of the stronger players (including myself) learned > anti-Stonewall techniques and by the time I had played 100+ speed > games against it and thought I was coming out of the opening against > it with a pretty good game. > > Am not sure I'd be happy playing my system vs anybody 2200+ but then I > don't know any masters who play stuff like that even vs "fish" like The Stonewall was played by Mr and Mrs Vujosevic in Toronto. Mr V was well over 2100 but has zero internet presence, not even at chessgames.com where some weaker people of the same name are listed so I can't check his peak rating. I think but am not sure that he was over 2200. Mrs V was a WIM, with a top FIDE rating of 2030. Both were quite skilled at it and I learned a lot about how to deal with it when played by reasonably strong players in our G/15 encounters. The newsgroups reader I am using won't let me set followups to rec.games.chess.misc (or more likely I just can't figure it out) but you may be able to. William Hyde > me. >