Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <vdf6ik$2cn51$14@dont-email.me>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vdf6ik$2cn51$14@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,alt.folklore.computers
Subject: Re: The joy of FORTRAN
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 21:52:21 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <vdf6ik$2cn51$14@dont-email.me>
References: <pan$96411$d204da43$cc34bb91$1fe98651@linux.rocks>
	<5mqdnZuGq4lgwm_7nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
	<vcub5c$36h63$1@dont-email.me>
	<36KdnVlGJu9VLW77nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
	<IfZIO.214180$FzW1.122138@fx14.iad>
	<ZLecncKpCfSfT2n7nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@earthlink.com>
	<ZOfJO.194439$kxD8.179224@fx11.iad>
	<nOWcncO0uZgZyWv7nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
	<79CJO.19676$MoU3.9722@fx36.iad>
	<lbmcnV0rM4Aq_Wr7nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@earthlink.com>
	<20240930103650.00003985@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 23:52:21 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a1a02b051aaecb67c07f3c0a04f3a680";
	logging-data="2514081"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19mTN+ZKCO+Zm0K8bNfJr4K"
User-Agent: Pan/0.160 (Toresk; )
Cancel-Lock: sha1:6zrSyuILV5UlKxZdM90AwaOfE74=
Bytes: 2382

On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 10:36:50 -0700, John Ames wrote:

> It's always struck me as funny that nobody *ever* seems to use the ASCII
> control characters that already exist for record demarcation for that
> purpose ...

Pick did, I believe.

> ... aside from CR/LF/tab/NUL, and BEL/SUB/ESC in interactive-
> terminal contexts, the whole 0x00-0x1F range might as well not exist.

Terminal systems do make use of other characters for various purposes,
e.g. CTRL/C for interrupt, CTRL/O to discard output etc.

I tried to get a discussion going on this subject in
alt.folklore.computers a few months ago
<https://alt.folklore.computers.narkive.com/5xa8qoJG/origins-of-control-characters>.

> Not that it'd be a conspicuously *good* idea, but I've always harbored
> an impish desire to devise a format that makes use of the rest in some
> way that maps relatively logically to the original intent/description...

You really have to wonder that that original intent was in some cases,
though ...