Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: ChatGPT correctly analyzed the first page of my paper: (typo
 corrected)
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 13:41:54 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 81
Message-ID: <vdk45j$3ah9l$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vdgpbs$2nmcm$1@dont-email.me> <vdgqhn$2nmcm$2@dont-email.me>
 <vdhaja$2qm1j$1@dont-email.me> <vdhhoc$2ma4$1@news.muc.de>
 <vdi0mh$2u1sn$1@dont-email.me> <vdj4hr$2k6$1@news.muc.de>
 <vdjlpc$38t86$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2024 20:41:55 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ddfbe8e236b96e9eb22acbe29860ad61";
	logging-data="3491125"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/k86EH8cdMvVQFxeCmdLI9"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:g3WgpCUdElEl5mqzau2pPLeqV34=
In-Reply-To: <vdjlpc$38t86$3@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 4026

On 10/2/2024 9:36 AM, olcott wrote:
> On 10/2/2024 4:42 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>> olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 10/1/2024 2:15 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>>>> olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 10/1/2024 7:39 AM, olcott wrote:
>>
>>>>> Simulating Termination Analyzer H is Not Fooled by Pathological 
>>>>> Input D
>>
>>>> [ .... ]
>>
>>
>>>>>> https://chatgpt.com/share/66fbec5c-7b10-8011-9ce6-3c26424cb21c
>>
>>
>>>>> The above link to a ChatGPT conversation is entirely
>>>>> complete with the first part being the entire input
>>>>> provided to ChatGPT. The second part is the output that
>>>>> ChatGPT deriving from analyzing this input.
>>
>>>> You are aware that programs like ChatGPT are know for "hallucinating"
>>>> non-facts?  They have even less understanding of the truth than you do.
>>
>>>> In fact, they tend to regurgitate whatever "facts" they are fed with.
>>
>>> In other words you can convince it that its analysis
>>> of my work is incorrect. I dare you to try to do that.
>>
>> I've got better things to do with my time.  Real live competent
>> mathematicians have shown your work to be incorrect. 
> 
> 
> Try this for yourself.
> Real live computer scientists begin with the assumption that I
> am incorrect and then try to justified that false assumption.
> 
> ChatGPT has not been indoctrinated thus reports on what it
> sees.
> 
> https://chatgpt.com/share/66fbec5c-7b10-8011-9ce6-3c26424cb21c
> 
> Does HHH have to abort its emulation of DDD to prevent the infinite 
> execution of DDD?
> 
> Several software engineers (two with master degrees in computer science)
> Agree with the ChatGPT answer to the above question when they were asked
> to independently derive this answer. Any C programmer that understands
> infinite recursion has agreed.
> 
>> What a dumb chat
>> program regurgitates has no relevance to anything.
>>
> 
> Unless what this dumb chat program says is irrefutably correct.
> To show that it is [INCORRECT] one must find an actual mistake.
> 
> No one has ever done that. The most that they did is show that
> things did not conform to their provably false assumptions.
> 

int main() { DDD(); } does have a different execution
trace than when it is emulated by the emulator that it
calls: HHH(DDD).

Pretending that the self-referential relationship
between HHH and DDD DOES NOT EXIST is merely dishonesty.

>> [ .... ]
>>
>>> -- 
>>> Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
>>> hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
>>
> 
> 


-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer