Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vdkql4$3ej63$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: John McCue <jmccue@neutron.jmcunx.com> Newsgroups: comp.misc Subject: Re: getting the most out of TWM Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 01:05:40 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 26 Message-ID: <vdkql4$3ej63$1@dont-email.me> References: <6691a1ad$2$1439839$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <87ttgtf1ck.fsf@enoch.nodomain.nowhere> <slrnvfm4bl.mqe.anthk@localhost.localdomain> Reply-To: jmclnx@SPAMisBADgmail.com Injection-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2024 03:05:40 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e89b153ad58aafe5acd3d3dbac4eda96"; logging-data="3624131"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+kk6m8kSEJ5iGcO0JNvo+b" User-Agent: tin/2.6.3-20231224 ("Banff") (NetBSD/10.0 (amd64)) Cancel-Lock: sha1:2t2wh6JuczlM3HGSMktFSsNxLDI= X-OS-Version: NetBSD 10.0 amd64 Bytes: 1998 Bozo User <anthk@disroot.org> wrote: > On 2024-07-13, Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> wrote: >> <snip> >> >> Thanks for the pointers. Configuring twm is "easy" but the details >> tend to be opaque. Examples such and those are invaluable. > > Similar, but with CWM or Blackbox with Emacs. Blackbox has no > keybindings support, so everything goes into Emacs. As I launch > it at ~/.xinitrc before blacbox, it works perfectly fine. blackbox use to have builtin key bindings, but the author moved all that logic to a separate utility called bbkeys, I think for version 6. IIRC, bbkeys could be used with other window managers back then. https://github.com/bbidulock/bbkeys A lot of people did not like that change and I believe fluxbox was created as a result. At the time I thought it was a decent idea. -- [t]csh(1) - "An elegant shell, for a more... civilized age." - Paraphrasing Star Wars