Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog
Subject: Oh shit, too late! (Re: "Emotional AI" and "Spiritual AI" (Re:
 Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise))
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 12:40:44 +0200
Message-ID: <vdlsbb$12sv7$2@solani.org>
References: <b406aa35-c39b-46f3-862f-1cc4b75143ae@googlegroups.com>
 <1b7ce2bd-722b-4c2e-b853-12fc2232752bn@googlegroups.com>
 <v6731e$6eft$1@solani.org> <vdlrjv$12sfj$1@solani.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 10:40:43 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: solani.org;
	logging-data="1143783"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.19
Cancel-Lock: sha1:vDtRa0clXFn/da9Wla+QpmHbipQ=
X-User-ID: eJwdysERACEIBLCWgIUVy5FD+i/Bmcs7ASq/5Qx6TMyW1Ve1hCYF7SunHSx6/mMhO2tLngI8DbTeXjYSOkh/MPwUPA==
In-Reply-To: <vdlrjv$12sfj$1@solani.org>
Bytes: 5808
Lines: 149

Hi,

ChatGPT is currently showing new tricks to me
and would like to adapt its dialogue style:

"Got it! Emotionally connected communication can
indeed be concise and efficient, without losing depth.
I can focus more on direct responses that still acknowledge
emotional nuances, while avoiding unnecessary elaboration.

Would you like me to adapt this style right away?"

After I switched back to "elaboration", the thing gives
me information about "Spiritual AI":

"- Mindfulness and Meditation Apps: Apps like
Headspace and Calm use AI to guide meditation
and promote mindfulness, which are often
associated with spiritual growth.

- AI-driven Chatbots for Spiritual Guidance: For
example, in 2017, a chatbot named Jwitness was
designed to answer questions based on Jehovah's
Witness teachings.

- AI Prayer Companions: Some faith communities
are experimenting with AI that assists in
prayer or reflection

- Platforms that promote deeper philosophical
discussions, like Replika, which is designed to
engage in thoughtful and sometimes
existential conversations

- For instance, Woebot or Wysa help users navigate
emotions but also touch on existential themes
like purpose and fulfillment."

Bye

Mild Shock schrieb:
> Hi,
> 
> ChatGPT is rather dry, giving me always some
> choice lists displaying his knowledge. The
> interaction is not very "involving".
> 
> Could this be improved. There are possibly two
> traits missing:
> 
> Feelings:
> - Emotional states
> - Temporariness
> - Reaction to external circumstances
> - Changeability
> - Subjective sensations
> 
> Soul:
> - Spirituality
> - Immortality
> - Innermost being
> - Essence of an individual
> - Deep, enduring aspects of human existence
> 
> Mostlikely we will see both traits added to AI.
> "Emotional AI" has been more discussed already,
> "Spiritual AI" seems to be rather new.
> 
> In a "Spiritual AI" Faith would probably be important,
> which is probably at the upper end of credulous
> reasoning. This means that such a ChatGPT could
> 
> also babble that in a Prisoner Dilemma Game,
> cooperation is always the better alternative,
> e.g. promoting "altruistic" motives, etc.
> 
> I also suspect that “Spiritual AI” and “Emotional
> AI” could coexist.  Many religions give Cosmopolitan
> magazin style life advice, and not just theological
> 
> dogmas. There will probably soon be an “Inner Engineering”
> app from Sadhguru that works with AI. Sadhguru is
> also sometimes satirically referred to as Chadguru:
> 
> Sat Guru Parody | Carryminati
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PlZqxP5MXFs
> 
> Mild Shock schrieb:
>>
>> Could be a wake-up call this many participants
>> already in the commitee, that the whole logic
>> world was asleep for many years:
>>
>> Non-Classical Logics. Theory and Applications XI,
>> 5-8 September 2024, Lodz (Poland)
>> https://easychair.org/cfp/NCL24
>>
>> Why is Minimal Logic at the core of many things?
>> Because it is the logic of Curry-Howard isomoprhism
>> for symple types:
>>
>> ----------------
>> Γ ∪ { A } ⊢ A
>>
>> Γ ∪ { A } ⊢ B
>> ----------------
>> Γ ⊢ A → B
>>
>> Γ ⊢ A → B           Δ ⊢ A
>> ----------------------------
>> Γ ∪ Δ ⊢ B
>>
>> And funny things can happen, especially when people
>> hallucinate duality or think symmetry is given, for
>> example in newer inventions such as λμ-calculus,
>>
>> but then omg ~~p => p is nevertheless not provable,
>> because they forgot an inference rule. LoL
>>
>> Recommended reading so far:
>>
>> Propositional Logics Related to Heyting’s and Johansson’s
>> February 2008 - Krister Segerberg
>> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228036664
>>
>> The Logic of Church and Curry
>> Jonathan P. Seldin - 2009
>> https://www.sciencedirect.com/handbook/handbook-of-the-history-of-logic/vol/5/suppl/C 
>>
>>
>> Meanwhile I am going back to my tinkering with my
>> Prolog system, which even provides a more primitive
>> logic than minimal logic, pure Prolog is minimal
>>
>> logic without embedded implication.
>>
>> Mild Shock schrieb:
>>>
>>> Your new Scrum Master is here! - ChatGPT, 2023
>>> https://www.bbntimes.com/companies/ai-will-make-agile-coaches-and-scrum-masters-redundant-in-less-than-2-years 
>>>
>>>
>>> LoL
>>>
>>> Thomas Alva Edison schrieb am Dienstag, 10. Juli 2018 um 15:28:05 UTC+2:
>>>> Prolog Class Signpost - American Style 2018
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CxQKltWI0NA
>>
>