Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vdmjkt$3qf48$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: is Vax addressing sane today Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 17:18:22 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 23 Message-ID: <vdmjkt$3qf48$1@dont-email.me> References: <vdg3d1$2kdqr$1@dont-email.me> <memo.20241001101211.19028o@jgd.cix.co.uk> <vdkn7l$3e4pf$8@dont-email.me> <h8zLO.37704$afc4.20001@fx42.iad> Injection-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2024 19:18:22 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="eeb652d320e5eaea50a717ccc20d5e91"; logging-data="4013192"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+wEKYLLC7/ouBHSLYDwiklPcvlQQMUu2E=" User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:tXLOdY71mabwbRC0AA/hptGi2Tg= Bytes: 1880 Scott Lurndal <scott@slp53.sl.home> schrieb: > Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> writes: >>On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 10:12 +0100 (BST), John Dallman wrote: >> >>> [Windows NT on MIPS] was a commercial failure, because MIPS >>> didn't keep up with the performance growth of x86. >> >>It was NT that was the commercial failure, not MIPS. MIPS found a niche in >>the embedded world, and went on to outsell x86 by a factor of 3:1 or so. > > Note that MIPS CPUs were used in SGI supercomputers and high-end > graphics workstations. I worked on one of the SGI machines for a time, it was the successor of the Cray which had been decommisioned before I started work at the company. It wasn't economical to keep around, so it got decommisioned when the next big reorganization (and big crisis) hit, and the staff then retired. For a time, the only machine for CFD applications at that company was an HP Itanium box on my desk...