| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vdmpil$3mb40$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: John R Walliker <jrwalliker@gmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: Minimum clearance for 230V AC. Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 19:59:33 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 50 Message-ID: <vdmpil$3mb40$1@dont-email.me> References: <b5uLO.36140$FIff.36030@fx02.ams1> <nMvLO.2934182$EVn.1109923@fx04.ams4> <j0ntfjhb1dkki2v0lj0a136lol2d5h89v0@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2024 20:59:34 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f4095109894f7c98f309b09fe9d794d6"; logging-data="3878016"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Zdad0yLnF2xQbZZnyzw7UeKC2n9/12LA=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:XmdYXv1W33ZPpQBsXJRh2GI//XM= In-Reply-To: <j0ntfjhb1dkki2v0lj0a136lol2d5h89v0@4ax.com> Content-Language: en-GB Bytes: 3095 On 03/10/2024 19:03, john larkin wrote: > On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 22:05:37 +1000, Chris Jones > <lugnut808@spam.yahoo.com> wrote: > >> On 3/10/2024 8:11 pm, Pimpom wrote: >>> What's the minimum surface clearance you consider adequate for 230VAC, >>> on FR4 without slots or added creepage? Forget about IPC-2221 unless you >>> base your layout strictly on it. >>> >>> Personally, I try to maintain 3mm edge-to-edge between tracks and pads, >>> more if space permits. What do you think? >> >> The distance along a surface is called creepage in the standards. >> >> The required distance depends on whether the insulation is supposed to >> be single insulation (functional, basic or supplementary) or double >> insulation (reinforced insulation). >> >> Basically, if the insulation failing ought not to kill someone because >> the part that would become live is either protectively earthed or >> separated by supplementary insulation from the user, then a smaller >> creepage is allowable. >> >> If the insulation failing could immediately give someone a shock because >> there is no protective earthing or supplementary insulation, then a >> larger creepage distance is required. >> >> The exact distances required in different standards tend to be >> different, though I think a lot of different products that used to be >> subject to different standards have recently been grouped into one set >> of standards, IEC62368-1. >> >> There are some tables here: >> https://www.powerctc.com/en/node/4757 >> >> I think you are going to come up with something like 2.5mm for basic >> insulation and 5mm for reinforced, but you should check carefully what >> the standards say, and for some classes of equipment it can be much >> more, like 6mm or 8mm. >> > > > What about voltage clearances for inner-layer traces on a multilayer > board? Same layer and between layers? > > > Its all in the standard. I could look it up tomorrow if you like. John