Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Chris Townley <news@cct-net.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.os.vms
Subject: Re: Apache + mod_php performance
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 00:00:30 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 39
Message-ID: <vdn7mf$3mc75$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vcv0bl$39mnj$1@dont-email.me> <vdd0kl$1tq3t$2@dont-email.me>
 <vdd0th$22qgt$1@dont-email.me> <vdd2mr$1tq3s$4@dont-email.me>
 <vdk7fi$jdm$1@reader1.panix.com> <vdkgkr$3ddoc$1@dont-email.me>
 <vdkjjs$3dnpf$2@dont-email.me> <vdkm8u$3e4pf$1@dont-email.me>
 <vdkmlv$3dnpf$5@dont-email.me> <vdkmv8$3e4pf$6@dont-email.me>
 <vdknkt$3dnpc$1@dont-email.me> <vdmq7c$3re7f$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2024 01:00:31 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f4e5971e64e2418fb9375e7d1d5ff4cd";
	logging-data="3879141"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX193VXvfIJuioTBY6IKIqbVn64mDK9dHqpc="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:uqhjHqh77oknCdfooJb9qaKNbQI=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <vdmq7c$3re7f$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2526

On 03/10/2024 20:09, Dave Froble wrote:
> On 10/2/2024 8:14 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>> On 10/2/2024 8:02 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 19:57:50 -0400, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>>>> It would be a lot easier without the C RTL data structures and the RMS
>>>> data structures.
>>>>
>>>> But they exist.
>>>
>>> VMS doesn’t force you to use them.
>>
>> True. But using $QIO(W) or $IO_PERFOM(W) for IO is exceptionally
>> rare.
> 
> Not around here.
> 
>>>                                     And I’m not clear what the point of
>>> them is, for network I/O.
>>
>> None.
>>
>> But I believe you said that on *nix you could transfer a file descriptor
>> over Unix socket as well.
> 
> I thought sockets was the issue?
> 
> Before we closed down operations, I was looking at passing a socket to 
> another process.  Not sure if I could, didn't get that far.  From the 
> docs, I should be able to open a socket with the SHARE flag, then have 
> another process open the same socket.
> 
I don't remember George, but we have certainly woken up Dave! ;)

and I am sure the troll is happy...


-- 
Chris