Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vdnv88$48hn$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: kids these days
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 15:42:17 +1000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <vdnv88$48hn$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v1rbfj18eqbgr1t9bfvdfqqmn1q91gcfof@4ax.com>
 <vd5r5k$q48h$1@solani.org> <d56ifj1angpnq16qhhb0vplmlr3tt7opnf@4ax.com>
 <vdbkap$tc4m$1@solani.org> <kb3jfjpejs47hqjd00fis20eog8de19ae8@4ax.com>
 <vddc4m$u7hu$1@solani.org> <l6ukfjl7m6q3eiki81t4ln3lr50057obl4@4ax.com>
 <7bglfjtll1os4g6pfqhf1i7jl0acmrvlqv@4ax.com> <vdehe9$29t3d$1@dont-email.me>
 <t3qlfjpbmdvfhbqccqp5k22kbf4tcr2r50@4ax.com> <vdjpr1$39i5r$1@dont-email.me>
 <nm1sfjhm3t7sjev3hm8h60lukpdo0vnjvu@4ax.com>
 <r35ufjpe7k68e4u30lvqsi4p87lmp9o1gd@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2024 07:42:34 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="24fe0745975a6ecc1cf9a2391eb48503";
	logging-data="139831"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19d6JElpmdWXjm5bh9UC5aQywj9of3U45M="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:xpbadWL3iHHZSD0Ht/92MBx31E8=
In-Reply-To: <r35ufjpe7k68e4u30lvqsi4p87lmp9o1gd@4ax.com>
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 241004-0, 4/10/2024), Outbound message
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2178

On 4/10/2024 8:03 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 19:53:49 -0700, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 16:45:37 +0100, Clive Arthur
>> <clive@nowaytoday.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> On 30/09/2024 19:11, john larkin wrote:

<snip>

>> I see the trend, good circuit designers retiring and not being
>> replaced.
> 
> Maybe not yet, but pretty soon AI will do it better than humans.

Probably not.  It could explore a solution space more thoroughly than a 
human, but it isn't clear that it could chose a solution space worth 
exploring.

-- 
Bill Sloman, Sydney